Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus INSPE OR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH, KARACHI

Sacked from job 3, 6 and 12 A government employee was given a show cause notice for being a police officer, which had the usual allegations and the government employee submitted his response, one of two inquiries by D-section P and the other: The DIG took action against the civil, employee and both the inquiry officers unanimously declared that the public servant could not be punished for the material before him and the charges against the civil servant were dismissed and accordingly the case. It was decided that, despite such a decision, the IGP, in exercising its modification powers under R. Eric made the final show cause notice to the employee. Out of the rules, 12 government employees responded to the cause notice, citing their reasons, but the IGP provided the government employee with a job notice without any formal investigation and without providing any material in the nature of the evidence against him. Dismissed from employment. The IGP had a cause notice and a government employee's response to determine the crime of a public servant, based on the reasons given by the IGP in support of his order, which he waits for. And no concrete evidence was presented on record to prove their conclusion, under the circumstances, that the allegations were not in a position to be sustained. Government employee proved to be otherwise difficult to accept IGP's unpopular and unconfirmed views about civil servants ?????? Despite the clear inquiry of the two inquiry officers who unanimously announced That a public servant cannot be punished for the substance in front of them. Services by IGP best advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer