Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH, KARACHI


Only one of the eight charges against the police officer was recommended by the R4 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), the Section 4 Police Officer Inquiry Officer, on the hefty fines and reduction of commission positions. The inquiry officer's recommendations have unanimously proved that the inquiry officer had fully discussed the evidence on each of the allegations in the Inquiry Inquiry report and consequently came to the facts while the results coming to the Inquiry Officer Was not agreed to. Due to his disagreement with the inquiry officer, no reason, no reason to state, the major fines for the reduction in the rating were collected by the appellant police officer on a specific date, with slight penalties to withhold the annual increase. Was, without any overall effect

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Blitang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.