Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

M.S. TARIQ versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Rr 13 1 & 13 17 (2) The authority of the police inspector general to review or modify the orders of his predecessor was not authorized to review or revise the orders of the advisers. The general police performed as if they were armed. Revising or revising orders of his predecessor was without legal basis Rr 13 1 & 13 17 (2) Confirmation of Police Officers strictly in accordance with the seniority of such officers belonging to Cadre Rule 13 1. Will go And 13 ((2), Police Rules, 1979) did not confirm the response of respondents who were inferior to the appellant officer, not only in the F list but also in the temporary sanitary list, a clear violation of Rule 13 1. 17 (2), Sindh Police Rules, 1979

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Balakot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.