Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SUKHDEV versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, SIND


Response to Section 8, Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 seniority vest not to be aggravated in appeal before the Right Service Tribunal

1980 P L C (C. S.) 543(1)

[Service Tribunal Sind]

Present: Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman and G. A. Mughal, Member

SUKHDEV

Versus

SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, SIND AND 3 OTHERS

Appeal No. 46 of 1979, decided on 2nd July, 1979.

Sind Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)‑

‑‑ S. 8 react with Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), S. 4 Seniority‑Not a vest right‑Cannot be agitated in appeal before Service Tribunal.

Kishinchand for Appellant.

ORDER

GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH (CFIAIRMAN).‑‑

This is an appeal under section 4 of the Sind Services Tribunals Act, 1973.

The appellant was working as Assistant in the office of the Survey Superintendent Khaupur when he was reverted as he was junior most accord ing to the approved seniority list vide order of the Director, Settlement dated 6‑1‑1977. He filed departmental appeal dated 13‑1‑1977 against that order of reversion but it was rejected by the Senior Member, Board of Revenue vide order dated 7‑5‑1979. In this appeal the reference has been made to the petition dated 12-2-1977 of the appellant. The appeal was rejected on the ground that the seniority list was issued in 1970 and no objection wag taken by the appellant. Consequently he was debarred from raising the objection at such a late stage.

In the first place the appeal against seniority is not maintainable in view, of the provisions of section 8 of Sind Service Tribunals Act, 1973 which lay down that the seniority is not a vested right. Secondly the appeal is hopelessly time-barred as the senority list of 1970 was shall challenged before this Tribunal in June, 1979. Thirdly it was not been shown that any departmental appeal leas filed against the seniority list.

Thus this appeal suffers from various serious infirmities and is, therefore, summarily dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.