Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HASSAN versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF PRISONS


The Retirement Prison Warden essentially slapped the prisoner under Misconduct in the case and admitted that there was no proposal to attack the prisoner while giving him the right to self defense, essentially a retirement sentence, in such a case. In the, the Tribunal was denied full valid interference under the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1974). 4

1980 P L C (C. S.) 584

[Service Tribunal Sind]

Present: Ghulam Rasool Shaikh, Chairman, Abdul Kadir and G. A. Mughal, Members

MUHAMMAD HASSAN

Versus

INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF PRISONS AND ANOTHER

Appeal No. 58 of 1978, decided on 4th June 1979.

Civil service‑

‑‑‑‑ Compulsory retirement ‑ Jail Warder slapping under-trial prisoner‑Misconduct admitted and established‑No suggestion of assault by prisoner giving right of self‑defence‑Penalty of compulsory retirement, in circumstances, held, fully justified‑interference refused by Tribunal‑Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1974), S. 4.

ORDER

GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH (CHAIRMAN)

.‑This is an appeal against compul sory retirement from service. The appellant was Chief Warder, Juvenile Jail, Landhi. There were certain allegations against him. One of the allegations was that he bad slapped an under-trial prisoner in presence of his father. He was charge‑sheeted and the aforesaid allegation was established not only by evidence but even by the admissions made by the appellant himself. Consequently he was retired from service. He filed a departmental appeal which was dismissed. So he filed the present appeal.

From the statement of facts it is plain enough that the appellant himself admitted that he had slapped the prisoner and this was clearly a violation of the Jail Rules and therefore, amounted to misconduct. There is no allega tion of any kind that the prisoner had assaulted or attempted to assault the appellant before he slapped the prisoner. It was not a case of self‑defence and there was absolutely no justification for the appellant to have acted id the manner in which he acted. That being so the penalty which was imposed was fully justified and does not call for any interference.

In result the appeal is dismissed:

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.