Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Appeal No. 53 of 1978, decided on 28th February 1979.
‑‑‑Age‑‑Appointment to civil service‑Condonation or relaxation of prescribed age‑Cannot be claimed as a right‑Discretion of authority to make reference to Government for relaxation‑Service rendered in not civil service/Government service Claim for counting such service for purpose of age‑Interference refused by Service Tribunal‑Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), S. 4.
Aslam Jaffery for Petitioner.
The appellant seeks to count the service as copyist for the purpose of counting his age but this conten tion cannot be accepted as copyist is not a Government service and the age for the purpose of Government service has to be considered on the date when he was appointed as clerk. Admittedly he was overage on that date. However, it has been urged that the case of appellant should have been referred to Government for condonation of age, This cannot A be claimed as a right. It is discretionary with the authority to make any such reference or not. Refusal to refer the matter to Government is not', open to any exception,
Appeal is summarily dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer