Monoply Control Authority — Judgments of 2005
13 reported judgments of the Monoply Control Authority from 2005.
- In the matter of: Messrs CHILTAN GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs CHILTAN GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED 2005 CLD 290
Failure to submit documents relating to Section 19 (1) (a) and 21 annual audited accounts took a month for 4 clients of the annual audited accounts for the year related to the enforcement of the penal…
- In the matter of: Messrs KOHAT CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs KOHAT CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED 2005 CLD 310
Order granted under section 19 (1) (a) of the Monopoly and Restricted Business Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970, for non-compliance with the provisions of section 19 (1) (a) (2) and …
- In the matter of: Messrs ESSA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs ESSA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED 2005 CLD 326
Failure to impose penalties for under-tacking in the supply of Sections 19 (1) (C) and 21 required information was made on a regular basis for under-tacking on 25 to 2003 for per tonne / bag delivery …
- In the matter of: Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED 2005 CLD 341
Sections 19 (1) (a) and 21 provide a cost per tonne / bag per factory price up to 25 3 2003 for imposing a failure to under-tack the supply of required information and regular supply of information on…
- In the matter of: Messrs DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRY LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRY LIMITED 2005 CLD 345
Sections 9 (1) (a) and 21 related to imposing fines for failure to supply the required information on the due date have been asked to pay per ton / bag per factory price as per the due date. There wer…
- Messrs MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED v. File No.2 (287)/IV/(Enq)/(Chief-R&I)/MCA/2003, decided on 3rd November, 2003. 2005 CLD 367
Sections 19 (1) (a) and 21 fail to supply the required information to supply the factory price per ton / bag per specified date for the penalty and are routinely faxed on a weekly basis. Has been aske…
- Messrs D.G. KHAN CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED v. File No.2(287)/IX/(Enq)/(Chief-R&I)/MCA/2003, decided on 3rd November, 2003. 2005 CLD 376
Sections 19 (1) (a) and 21 were asked to supply a factory price per ton / bag per day by failing to impose a failure to under-tuck in the supply of required information and by regular fax. In addition…
- Messrs DEWAN KHALID TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED v. File No. 8(267)INV/(DD-R&I)/MCA/84, decided on 6th September, 2003. 2005 CLD 387
Failure of under-takings in the provision of sections 19 and 21 required the enforcement of fines to provide the required information / documents through letters up to the due date, but the Undertakin…
- Messrs RAJA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. Messrs RAJA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2005 CLD 1042
Failure to Undertake in Provision of Sections 19 and 21 Required Information Undertaking Penal Undertaking was asked to provide information / documents under Section 21 of the Monopoly and Compulsory …
- In the matter of: Messrs NUTRIPAK FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs NUTRIPAK FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED 2005 CLD 1056
Sections 19 and 21 related to penalizing the failure of Undertaking to provide the required information, were asked to provide information / documents related to the Undertaking activities, including …
- In the matter of: Messrs INVESTEC SECURITIES LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs INVESTEC SECURITIES LIMITED 2005 CLD 1079
The persons concerned were asked to provide information / documents under Section 21 of the Monopoly and Compulsory Trading Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970, for penalties for failur…
- In the matter of: Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LIMITED 2005 CLD 1086
Sections 19 and 21 were asked to provide the required information / documents related to the letter for failure to provide the information required for under-tacking, but the Undertaking failed to com…
- In the matter of: Messrs ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED v. In the matter of: Messrs ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED 2005 CLD 1096
Sections 19 and 21 were said to impose fines on under-tacking failure to provide information by the due date, supplying the cost per ton / bag as per factory, as in 2003 the under-tacing was regularly…
Other years — Monoply Control Authority
2005
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.