IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS RUPALI POLYESTER LIMITED versus IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS RUPALI POLYESTER LIMITED
Sections 19 and 21 were asked to provide the required information / documents related to the letter for failure to provide the information required for under-tacking, but the Undertaking failed to comply within the stipulated period, Undertaking by the Authority. In response to the Cause Notice submitted by Undertaking, after providing this information, the ShowCause Notice must be withdrawn. The required information was provided by Undertaking with a delay of eight days and the Undertaking delayed by eight days. The reasons presented were not convinced that under section 19 (1) (a) King was fined. Monopoly and Compulsory Trading Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer
