Find a Lawyer

IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS KOHAT CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED versus IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS KOHAT CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED

Order granted under section 19 (1) (a) of the Monopoly and Restricted Business Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970, for non-compliance with the provisions of section 19 (1) (a) (2) and 21 Implementation of penalty authority by Undertaking was to pay a fine of Rs.50, 000 and the amount of the penalty under the relevant Head of Account Headnotes under the specified date, which was defaulted and the penalty was not paid till the due date. Imposes a fine of Rs 10,000 per monopoly and restriction on the date of alleged default under section 19 (2) of the Restricted Business Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970. N, failing to pay the fine within the stipulated time, the matter was forwarded to the District Collector for collection of the outstanding balance. Acquiring ground revenue through a letter stating that a fine of Rs 50,000 has been paid and additional fine has been requested on the date of the waiver and / or date of hearing. Undertaking's representative could not give a specific reason to support the authority of his application, informing the Undertaking Representative that the authority has become a function officer after the approval of the unidentified orders, and that he can review his orders under this law. Not in position and trying to reopen Undertaking. It is a closed matter while the Monopoly and Compulsory Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, within the time limit set in 1970, should have taken appropriate action to appeal, which it failed to do. criminal advocate from Silanwala lawyer