IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED versus IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED
Sections 19 and 21 were said to impose fines on under-tacking failure to provide information by the due date, supplying the cost per ton / bag as per factory, as in 2003 the under-tacing was regularly told that the weekly Production and delivery should be provided along with the information provided on the basis. Each day of the week also had to provide reasons for any changes in pricing, but failed to provide the required information to the under-authorizing authority, in response to the notice, Undertaking provided the required information, followed by a post. 7 7 Authority 2003. Considering all the facts of the case and the arguments of the authorized representative of the undercutting, it was decided that the assurances that the delay in the delivery of the required information was not convincing and the monopoly and compulsory trading practices (control). Under section 19 (i) (c) has been ordered to impose fines on under-taking. And Prevention) Ordinance, 1970
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
