IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS ESSA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED versus IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS ESSA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Failure to impose penalties for under-tacking in the supply of Sections 19 (1) (C) and 21 required information was made on a regular basis for under-tacking on 25 to 2003 for per tonne / bag delivery per factory price. He was also asked to provide information on a timely basis. Every day of the week also had to explain the reasons for any change in production and departure prices; a failure to supply the required information to the undercovering authority; I have been told that the required information will be provided according to the post 27 6 2003 Undertaking requested that she be sending the required dispatch reports from 13 6 2003 followed by the due date Undertaking for the authorized representative hearing. Did not appear, but could not provide a compelling reason for not providing information until 13 6 2003. Required by the Authority It has been noted that since Undertaking has been regularly presenting the required information since 13 6 2003, it has adopted a monopoly and a binding view of the past default. Ordered to impose fines on under-taking under section 19 (1) (c) of the Business Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
