Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1969
184 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1969 — page 2 of 2.
- GOAS ALI v. FIROZA KHATOON 1969 PLD 548
Section 2 (viii) (a) Section 2 (viii) (a) Treatment of the husband is not necessarily the treatment of some attacks but the treatment of the husband is not necessary. A separate slap or minor blow by …
- KARNAPHULI RAYON AND CHEMICALS LTD v. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS, CHITTAGONG 1969 PLD 559
The first schedule of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, the responsibility of salesmen for item 35 [such as through the Finance Act, 1967], item 35, the First Schedule, proposed a tax on viscosit…
- ADAMJEE JUTE MILLS LTD v. CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL COURT, EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 567
Factories Act 1934 Section 49B (3), Explanation Employees remaining on strike for 67 days Employer agreed to treat employees as leave without pay, after employees terminated strike, 17 days for restor…
- JAMES FINLAY & CO. LTD. v. AMINUL ISLAM 1969 PLD 571
Establishment of Articles 42 and 44 of the East Pakistan Labor Disputes Act 1965, the East Pakistan Replacing and Amendment Ordinance (XIII of 1966) and the East Bengal General Clauses Act of 1925, Se…
- MESSRS ESSENTIAL INDUSTRIES, DACCA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1969 PLD 582
Section 26 of the Income Tax Act, 1922 read with Income Tax Rules, 1922, r 3, Section 26A Partnership Act (IX of 1932), Section 18 Application for Registration of Intra-virus 3 Does not bypass the spe…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. MESSRS PAK. TRADING CO., DACCA 1969 PLD 585
On appeal to impose fines under both sections (a) and (b) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, section 28 (1) (a), (b) and 31 (4) (f) of the Income-tax Officer section 31 (4). Appellate Assistant Commissioner…
- AMEDUR RAHMAN v. KABIR ARMED 1969 PCRLJ 585
Under Section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC), action is urgently required and must be promptly recorded by the magistrate clearly before the action begins to raise concerns about a breach o…
- TOFAZZAL HUSSAIN v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 589
Defense of Pakistan Ordinance 1965 read with section 3 (3, (iii), Defense of Pakistan Rules, 1965, r. 52 (as amended on November 16, 1966)). But was subsequently introduced by the rule that the rule o…
- TOBARAK ALI MAJHI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 596
Pakistan Penal Code Section 9/9/9/9 Handing over the opinion of a handwriting expert by other evidence…
- MAMTAZUDDIN AHMED v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 602
Criminal breach of trust in the Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 case was completely misunderstood and all innocent persons were prosecuted and harassed for seven years.…
- MONOARA BEGUM v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 603
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 522 Restoration of possession of immovable property, In any criminal case, no accused can challenge the legal status of an order approved under section 522 when…
- HAFIZUDDIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 610
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 147, 324 and 325 have read that after the formation of the unlawful assembly, the turmoil caused by the turmoil caused itself to be in the form of injury (simple or sa…
- BASIRUDDIN AHMED v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 618
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 9/9/9/9 imports fraud so far alleging that it has not proved a crime to prove guilt nor has taken any illegal advantage in this matter, nor has it. It can only be maint…
- REAZUDDIN AHMED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DACCA 1969 PCRLJ 619
Defense Pakistan Rules 1965 Detention of Opinion Opinion Although this day is hardly a day for the government without jeopardizing the peace and security of any region or endangering the maintenance o…
- GOUR PADA KABIRAJ v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 623
Due to misinterpretation of fake documents of Pakistan Penal Code Section 477 accounts, the accused in the case of prosecution was completely misunderstood and an innocent person was tried.…
- AKBAR ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 636
Pakistan Penal Code Section 147 has been charged with rioting in which a common objection has been made to forcibly seize disputed land and settle the complainant there, after trial, after discussing …
- MESSRS AZAD AND PUBLICATIONS LTD. v. AZAD PRESS KARMACHARI UNION 1969 PLD 636
Section 6 of the East Pakistan Labor Conflict Act 1965 read with the East Pakistan Employment of Labor (Standing Orders) Act (VIII of 1965), Section 25, Section 25, Standing Orders Act, in the case of…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN v. TAR MUHAMMAD HAJI NAMED 1969 PTD 638
The Tribunal should not interfere with the fact-finding by virtue of the evidence read with Section 16 (3) (a) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the income of the minor from the contribution transferr…
- Mst. AKBARI BEGUM v. THS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1969 PTD 643
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 16 (3) (a) (iv) Individually Held, Individually Mr Hameedi Begum v. Income Tax Commissioner, East Pakistan 14 is not a male and a male.…
- DHONA v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 644
Section 209 read with the promise of magistrates Prima facie unlawfully discharged by Section 209 and charges against the accused, accused of weighing illegal magistrate's evidence in the case, the Se…
- RAHENUDDIN MALLIK v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 647
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary injections and interlocutory orders o XXXIX, r 1 Praying for a temporary injunction pending by the plaintiff to sell a temporary injunction case is doubtful …
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. HAJEE MUSLIMULLAH 1969 PLD 649
Read rr 3 and 4 with Code X Civil Code 1908A XXII, r 11 and O XLI, r or reduction of appeal, either partially or under the full guidelines, death of one of the pending respondents under O XXII. Failur…
- MANIK LAL SWARNAKAR v. THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PCRLJ 650
The Defense of Pakistan Rules, 1965, ordering the detention of a person in his jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner of the District, is the fact that Dento was subsequently removed from the jurisdi…
- NURUDDIN MRIDHA v. DISTRICT JUDGE, FARIDPUR 1969 PLD 654
The West Pakistan Reconciliation Courts are not eligible to interfere with the decision and decree under section 8 (2) (b) of the section judge, section B, section judge of section 8, section 8, secti…
- ABDUL RAHIM v. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, ARMY STORES INSPECTION DEPOT, DACCA 1969 PLD 657
Article 98 (2), (3) (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962, the terms and conditions of service specifically provided in the Constitution are not subject to the decision in the application under Art…
- AINUDDIN BEPARI v. BANESSA BIBI 1969 PLD 658
Civil Code 1908, section 47 and AXXII, RR 3 and 4 may require the court to implement the decree and, when the execution court may refuse, either the initial or final, the party approved after the deat…
- MEHERUNNESSA KHATOON v. MD. HAFIZUR RAHMAN 1969 PLD 666
Paupers O XXXIII, rr 1 and 9 Pauper suits are allowed to sue as pauper under r1 by the Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIII even when there is no action under court 9, during the trial Can use it.…
- ABDUL HALIM v. FAIZUNNESSA BIBI ALIAS SARADA 1969 PLD 670
Arbitration Arbitration Act 1940 Section 30 Arbitration Discretion By arbitration of parties' rights based on a question of limitation…
- ZEENAT TEXTILE MILLS (E. PAK.) LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA ZONE 1969 PLD 673
Interim assessment read with Income Tax Act 1922 Section 45A Sections 2 (14), 3, 23B and 55 Additional tax amount on income tax imposed in section 45A of tax amount equal to 6% annual This does not me…
- CHAKMAN MOLLA v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 674
Evidence Act 1872 Section 32 Death Declaration Answers to some of the questions answered by the mark and the lips Declaration, answering some questions, held, accepted.…
- JABAN ALI KHAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 681
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 33A (2) of the revision limit term within one year from the date of order. The mean threshold period starts from the date of the order and not from the date of communicatio…
- MESSRS LUDLOW PAKISTAN Co. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DACCA 1969 PTD 686
Section 24 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, is the only reason to prove that diversified activities lie as a single business. Unable to do so, meaning that the Tribunal failed to accept the Assisi dis…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA ZONE, DACCA v. AMIN JUTE BALING COMPANY, DACCA 1969 PLD 687
Section 24 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1922 promotes loss and a combination of deficits making the jute business agent of the insurer an insurance company agent. And permanently interdependent losses in…
- ABDUL MAJID v. MD. MANSUR ALI 1969 PCRLJ 692
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) reads with the powers of Sections 203 Sections 200 and 202 that a complaint should be dismissed without proceeding which the Magistrate may act as limited to the st…
- M. K. HOSSAIN v. OMER GAZI CHOWDHURY 1969 PCRLJ 710
Section 7 reads Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) 96 96 and read 98 with 537, and no inquiry is required to make an order under section 96 or section Mag 98 under the search warrant section & 96 and of …
- MAKBUL HOSSAIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 715
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 299, 302 and 304, Part II have been accused of assaulting his wife with wet razor knowing that it was dangerous enough to cause death but such The attack is not dangerous …
- MD. ESACK v. RAJA MIAH 1969 PLD 719
In the case of filing arbitration order of the Arbitration Act 1940 section 34, the respondent expressing any other action in the formal inter-plea petition sought to show the reason for praying for t…
- Syeda ZOHRA KHATUN v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PCRLJ 729
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 Detention of objectionable speeches that Datino has declared as true or misleading all errors and commissions, revealing his intention to discredit the government, in or…
- MASTER THREAD BALL WORKS v. H. A. KARIM 1969 PLD 734
Trademarks Act 1940 Section 10 (1) The two trademarks have different meanings of the word master and master; the two sets of trademarks differ visually and phonetically; there is no possibility of con…
- HACHI MIA v. FULJAN KHATUN 1969 PCRLJ 738
Failure to inspect doctor in connection with accusation under Section 323 of Pakistan Penal Code Section 323, not fatal in prosecution case…
- MAHBUBUL HUQ v. THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 741
Conflict Settlement (First Election) Order 1962 Article 21 Reading with Conflict Settlement (First Election) Order (Amendment) Order (1 of 1963) Before amending Article 21, the amendment to the electi…
- PAHARUDDIN v. ANSARUDDIN 1969 PCRLJ 744
Magistrate evidence read with criminal code of conduct (CCPC) section 437 and the records of the accused who were allegedly discharged from the material according to the records indicate that the alle…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. MUHAMMAD FAZAL KHAN 1969 PCRLJ 756
The use of a hit by the Pakistan Penal Code Section 436 misconduct proved that it was used in the custody of the property which led to such destruction, but set fire to the crime under section 436 and…
- YUNUS MEAH v. ABDUR RASHID 1969 PCRLJ 759
Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) deals only with the question of possession of the disputed property, and at the time of the inquiry, the question of the right, title and interest …
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. ASHRAF ALI 1969 PLD 764
Sections 3, 5 (1), (7) and 7 (e) of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948 will be determined on the basis of supply of market value section 7 (e) of the land as it stands on the date of notifi…
- MOBARAK ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 766
Read with Pakistan Panel Code Section 304, Part I and 324 Section 109, during the events of the parties' mood, there was a lot of uproar and slight flare on both sides, which could have serious conseq…
- BEGUM LUTFONNESSA IBRAHIM v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 779
The case available under the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 98 Treatment Town Environment Act (East Bengal Act XIII of 1953) is not suitable for dealing under Article 98 and the land is reprodu…
- JABBAR ALI GAZI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 784
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 145 When a Property Acquisition Magistrate's Failure to Conduct Failure to Conduct Significant Documentary Evidence on a Question of Occupancy Well, the law is …
- JAGAT CHANDRA DAS v. ASSISTANT CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY 1969 PLD 795
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 r 182 (1) and East Pakistan Enemy Property (Land and Buildings) Administration and Settlement Order, 1966 (Order No. 22 General), paragraph 5 (3), paragraphs 7, 9 and 10…
- MRS. MOMTAZ MALLIK v. THE TAXING OFFICER (REGISTRAR HIGH COURT), DACCA 1969 PLD 803
Court Fees Act 1870 Section 8, Article 1, Schedule J and Article II, Schedule II read with the application of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act (III of 1948), against section S & 7 (f) indemnit…
- IMAM ALI FAKIR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 811
No hostility has been established between the Pakistan Penal Code Section 395 robbery prosecution witnesses and the accused, and there is no reason for such witnesses to falsely implicate the accused …
- ALI HOSSAIN v. SAYEDUR RAHMAN 1969 PCRLJ 822
The criminal code of conduct (CRPC) read under section 147 under section 147 does not cease to be a necessary element of the jurisdiction of the court unless the proceedings made under section (1) of …
- EAST PAKISTAN INLAND WATER TRANSPORT AUTHORITY v. HAJI ABDUL JALIL BEPARI 1969 PLD 832
Civil Code 1908 Section 104 of the Code of Appeal was made by an unqualified appellate court, while denying the order of appeal to be amended on the terms of the amendment of the order, it is appealed…
- RAJENDRA NARAYAN PANDAY v. THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 836
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 r 169 (2} The joint Hindu family stationery shop jointly owned by father and four sons (two minors) is a father who is an Indian citizen but claims to have a son after t…
- GURU DAS SAHA v. THE DEPUTY CUSTODIAN, ENEMY PROPERTY (LANDS AND BUILDINGS), EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 841
The Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 rr 161 & 181 read with Civil Code of Conduct (vof1908), Article 83 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 Section (b), r 161 of any person residing in the t…
- MUSLIM MIAH v. MUNSAR ALI HAJI 1969 PCRLJ 849
Regulation 203 and section 203 read with section 202 and the dismissal of the complaint is subject to consideration of the complainant's oath and the result of an investigation or inquiry, if any, und…
- CHOWDHURY MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. SAKHAWAT HOSSAIN 1969 PLD 849
The Code of Civil Code 1908 provides very broad discretion to the District Judge / High Court in matters of dismissal, transfer and other proceedings in cases 244 and 115, however, it is a judicial an…
- SHAMSUL HAQUE MIA v. Mst. JAHANARA BEGUM 1969 PCRLJ 854
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 8 - 6 () The pre-rehabilitation proceedings do nothing to indicate that the opposition (husband) is deliberately neglecting to appear in court. The pre-order of…
- HAJI SARU MIA SAWDAGAR v. MST. AI-HAJ JAHANARA BEGUM 1969 PLD 856
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 read with section 47, East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 (XXVIII of 1951), section 75A [inserted by the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy (Amendmen…
- JAINAL ABEDIN MIA v. WAJID ALI HOWLADAR 1969 PCRLJ 857
Sections 200 and 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) prevented such a magistrate from seeking further evidence, after receiving a notice of a sub-divisional magistrate inquiry, referring the …
- THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, CHITTARANJAN COTTON MILLS LTD., DACCA v. THE CHITTARANJAN COTTON MILLS\' STAFF UNION, DACCA 1969 PLD 861
Great importance attached to the end of fact by the East Pakistan Labor Disputes Act, 1965 Section 6 Domestic Inquiry Inquiry unless the Labor Court is able to appeal such inquiry unless it has the ab…
- Shiekh MUHAMMAD MUSA v. GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PCRLJ 862
Defense Pakistan Rules 1965 rr 32 & 41 (6) Prevention Detention Detieno Participate in the proceedings of the political meeting Decisions made at the meeting: (a) to reduce the confidence of the peopl…
- SHAHIDULLAH KAZI v. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (DEVELOPMENT) AND ELECTION TRIBUNAL, DISTRICT` FARIDPUR 1969 PLD 868
Sections 21 and 53 of the Electoral College Rules, 1964, R36 (1A) with the constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 158 and Electoral College Rules, 1964, R36 (1A), the constitutional jurisdiction of …
- ANWAR HOSSAIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 869
In the case of relief of section 167 (81) and 212 section 212 of the C Customs Act 1878, a petition should be made against the accused against section 212, especially the charge should be mentioned.…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN v. TAR MUHAMMAD HAJI HAMED 1969 PLD 905
The Tribunal should not interfere with the fact-finding by virtue of the evidence read with Section 16 (3) (a) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the income of the minor from the contribution transferr…
- MST. AKBARI BEGUM v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1969 PLD 910
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 16 (3) (a) (iv) Individually Held, Individually Mr Hameedi Begum v. Income Tax Commissioner, East Pakistan 14 is not a male and a male.…
- MD. RAFIQUE v. MD. SIDDIQUE 1969 PLD 913
After leasing the original lease and the landlord occupying the provisions of section 106 and 116 of the Property Act 1882, the rent is accepted, and such new lease is believed to operate under the pr…
- ABUL HOSSAIN v. MD. MASIM ALI GAZE 1969 PLD 923
East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 Section 96 pre-emption By a partner under a land restoration agreement for a stranger, such an agreement cannot defeat the pre-emptive shareholder's …
- JAFFAR HOSSAIN v. DACCA MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE 1969 PLD 927
The identity of the articles sent to the East Pakistan Pure Food Ordinance 1959 Sections 7 and 44 blending analyst or Chemical Examiner was not established, there is no evidence that the investigating…
- GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN v. AQUIL AHMED 1969 PLD 930
Civil Code of Conduct 1908 Section 11 Race Judiciary, challenging the writ jurisdiction, dismissed the writ petition for termination of notice for 14 days in accordance with the terms of the appointme…
- HAJEE NURUL ISLAM CHOWDHURY v. THE PATIY TEA CO. LTD. 1969 PLD 946
Sections 3 and 4 of the Defense of Pakistan Ordinance 1965 read with the Defense of Pakistan Rules, 1965, R182 and the Enemy Property (Detention and Registration) Order, 1965, Article 4 (2) (iv) the H…
- BASHIRULLAH MUNSHI v. ABDUL BARI BEPARI 1969 PLD 950
Section 151 and O XLVII, r 1 Stand Order may be modified or changed in appropriate circumstances. The court's jurisdiction has the power to review, amend, or amend the rules relating to procedural mat…
- NAZIMUDDIN KHAN v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 957
Articles 5 and 7 (ii) read with the Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 115 Arbitrativia Estoppel Paint states that the applicant once accepts the amount of compensation for signing the contract, later …
- FARID AHMED v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 961
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 1 Cur 130 Curfew, firing on violators of the degree of force used depends on the situation where these individuals execute lawful commands and the power of lawle…
- ABDUL JABBAR KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 965
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) with the approval of Section 337 (2) and Chip XVIII of Section 337 (including inquiry under Chip XVIII) may be examined by the Criminal Pardon Magistrate through inquir…
- MESSRS LUDLOW PAKISTAN CO. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1969 PLD 966
With the Income Tax Act 1922 section 66 section 24 (2), the Tribunal inquired as to whether the two SCCC schemes are the same business. The fact-finding does not repeat such a finding with the help of…
- MST. LUTFUN NAHAR v. SYEEDA HASHMAT ARA BEGUM 1969 PLD 979
East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 Section 2 (14) Word - Homestead land is settled primarily for residential purposes but the lease is allowed to use part of the garden as well as tena…
- TOTA MIA AND 9 OTHERS v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 991
Private defense read with Pakistan Penal Code Section 304 Section 96, Review of the right of free war between the two parties to the wounds inflicted by both sides, on the proper arrest of death or re…
- THE STATE v. M. A. QUDDUS 1969 PCRLJ 1359
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 526 (1) (a), (4) Transfer of a case by state affidavit or endorsement is not necessary with such a request denying the special judge's request for prosecution.…
- ABDUS SAHIM alias ABDUL SAHIM v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1368
Section 409 of the Pakistan Penal Code read with the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (XL of 1958), neither the particulars of the allegations nor the sanction of powers are available under the s…
- MILAN PRAMANIK v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1375
Section 1 42 42 and the ellate Court Appellate Court, the magistrate's duties do not consider the separation of charges against the relevant accused and punish them in lumps under each section, the la…
- BANDE ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1378
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) has a history of going wrong with the accused involved in Section 342 trial magistrate examination, they are subjected to prejudice due to confusion in their mind when …
- NOWMAN HUSSAIN alias NOWAN HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1390
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 Section 23 Whether the return of an illegal return is to be made knowingly and deliberately Question: The return of a foreign country reliably and knowingly de…
- MUKUNDA LAL BISWAS v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1451
Criminal Code (CR PC) Sections 4 (h) and 190 (1) (c) do not disclose the identity or address of the complainant, thereby submitting the correct details of the accused and the magistrate has no such ch…
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.