Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1956
36 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1956.
- MST. BEHAR JAN NESSA ALIAS HALIMA KHATUN v. SAIJUDDIN KHAN 1956 PLD 1
Rule Civil Code 1908 Section 11, Explanation IV The judgment of the Judesta judgment challenged the earlier proceedings on the ground that the former court could grant a verdict only if the matter on …
- BENOY BHUSAN SARA v. MUHAMMAD ABDUL SAMAD ALIAS LADAI MIAH 1956 PLD 14
Stamp Act 1899 Section 2 (22) Promotion Note An essential role of a device that has a bare promise of payment is a promissory note The statement of consideration for that promise is not detrimental to…
- TAMIRUDDIN SAKHIDAR v. RAUFANNESSA BIBI 1956 PLD 24
CPC death, marriage and parties insurance Appeals to the ACCC's Civil Procedure Code Order XXII, r 4 deceased respondents already on record may be terminated if others are not brought on record. So by…
- ABDUL SOBAN v. PURNA CHANDRA DEY 1956 PLD 29
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 100 Rights The question of construction of an entry in which another document is quoted among the parties, namely, the registered lease, is not a direct and substantially …
- JATINDPA NATH MONDAL v. BENI MONDAL 1956 PLD 35
CPC Processing of Order and Order XXI Civil Procedure Code Order XXI, r 90 Cells can be completely separated, although only one of several decision-makers applies to order XXI, Rule 90, specifically s…
- A. S. M. SHAMSUZZAMAN v. ABDUL TAHER BHUIYAN 1956 PLD 46
The provisions of Section 13, Section 13, along with the affidavit, did not fail with the request for execution of the previous party decree, dismissing the proceedings. I can interfere.…
- KUMAR BHUPENDRA KISHORE ACHARYYA CHOUDHURY v. PROVINCE OF BENGAL AND IN ITS PLACE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL 1956 PLD 58
The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 applies only where Article 120 suit for the declaration of right under the Bengal Tenancy Act is fixed under the Term and Tenancy Permanent, whether or not Article 111…
- MOKACHHED MOLLA v. ABDUL JABBAR MOLLA 1956 PLD 96
CPC Orders and Orders Section 47 and Civil Procedure Code XXI AXXI Implementation of Order XXI, r 2 The order may be processed by the court from time to time, which is not certified by the court. No s…
- NURUL ISLAM v. AMINULLA 1956 PLD 101
In the previous case of the Code of Conduct 1908 Section 11, the former Paste Directory does not serve as a justification for the rental rate if no declaration was made specifically about the rent rat…
- SAHAR ALI v. SARAR ALI 1956 PLD 102
Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CR PC) Section 345 (6) allows a session judge whether the sentence can be reduced without hearing his appeal.…
- THE CROWN v. ENAT ALI BISWAS 1956 PLD 104
No person has been arrested and under no other restrictions, even if such person can be guaranteed a criminal code of conduct (V9 1898), section 497.…
- WALI BHUIYA v. AHIZUDDIN 1956 PLD 106
Pakistan Penal Code Section 325 Sentencing Whether Only One Legal Sentence Is Right The High Court may amend the sentence in exercise of its revised jurisdiction.…
- ABDUL HAKIM BHUIYA v. GOLABDI 1956 PLD 108
Section 256 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) warrants case in a joint trial of summons and warrant cases…
- YAD ALI SHEIKH v. HAZRAT ALI FAKIR 1956 PLD 111
The Impact of the Final Order Decision on the Preliminary Decree for the Submission of Mortgage Liabilities After the Approval of the Review, Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), A. XLVII…
- ABDUL MANNAN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 114
Evidence Act 1872 Section 114 (e) Judicial and Official Act Concerning its Regular Performance…
- MASTER AMIRUZZAMAN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 119
C Customs Act 1878 Section 167 Term \ Foreign Ownership Foreign Foreign private ships mean that they are exempt from the laws of the country, whether they are in private persons overseas or subject to…
- TORAB ALI MONDAL v. JAFARUDDIN MONDAL 1956 PLD 140
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 379 and 427 show the offense under Preliminary Complaint Section 379 even if the punishment under section 427 is maintained.…
- SYAM OSTA ALIAS SHAMSUDDIN OSTA v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 142
A confession of an accused in the original case, if a subpoena against another accused is admissible in the Equality Act (1 of 1872), section 167 application…
- SAMIR SHAIKH v. AIJAN BEWA 1956 PLD 143
In the possession of a property, the Mohammedan La Gift Life Estate is a legitimate gift, whether a gift under Mohammedan law which is subject to any conditions and which comes out of the entirety of …
- NIRMAL CHANDRA CHOUDHURY v. NIKUNJA BEHARI BISWAS 1956 PLD 148
The Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115, Order XXI RR 98 and 103 has been applied, that it is outside the scope of the application under Order XXI Rule 98 and to inquire into the question of the parties'…
- SM. BIDHU MUKHI DASSYA v. SM. SARLA SUNDRI DASSYA 1956 PLD 153
Contract Act 1872 Section 16 ue ue Unlawful Impact \ omin Domination ?????? Pledge of proof The present case was filed for the declaration that the execution of the gift that the husband executed in f…
- NURUL ISLAM v. SAIBUDDIN 1956 PLD 188
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 439 Application, should not be used lightly under the jurisdiction assigned to the High Court under Section 439 of the Criminal PC when it pleads against the or…
- BORHANUDDIN MIA v. NAGENDRA KUMAR BHOWMICK 1956 PLD 189
Civil Code 1908 Section 15 Order to Refuse Processing as Order Section Implementation…
- EJAHAR MEAH CHOWDHURY v. RAJ KUMAR CHAKRABORTY 1956 PLD 194
Limitation Act 1908 Article 85 The meaning of changing the balance of the words mutualism and expression where mutual demands have been made between the parties.…
- RIVER STEAM NAVIGATION CO. LTD. v. JOGESH CHANDRA GHOSH 1956 PLD 196
Sections 230 and 233 of the Contract Act 1872 completely harassed…
- HARIPADA ROY CHOUDHURY v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST BENGAL 1956 PLD 210
Indian Independence (rights, property and liabilities) Order 1947 Article 8, Clause 4 Under Article 8, Indian Independence Clause 4 (rights, property and liabilities) Order 1947, the only proof of the…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 218
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 197 Government Employees Offering Bribes Even though Sections 116 and 161ppc are required to have a permit for litigation, although they are the standard of the…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIK v. ROBEA KHATUN 1956 PLD 245
Whether the transfer of sections 106 and 107 of the Property Act 1882 is a lease yearly or a month-to-month lease and the agreement between the leasing harassers is not sufficient to prove that the an…
- AMINUL HAQUE v. ABDUL WAHAB 1956 PLD 250
Application of Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 197 For the application of Section 197, a criminal PC shall be examined during a litigation against a public servant, in order to make his applica…
- ALAUDDIN BHUIA v. ANWAR ALI 1956 PLD 253
Upon termination of proceedings under Section 144, proceedings may be initiated on termination of proceedings under Section 144 Magistrate or fresh proceedings under Section 145 where the formal order…
- THE CROWN v. OSI ALIAS OSIMUDDIN MONDAL- 1956 PLD 256
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 274 accused tried to plead guilty to death penalty…
- MAFIZUDDIN MIA v. MUSLIM KHANDKAR 1956 PLD 272
Rule Civil Code 1908 Section 9 Civil Court has jurisdiction to try all civil cases in the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, (1887), Section 16, because of a mistrial trial in the General Court. The o…
- BADARUDDIN v. AYMANA KHATUN 1956 PLD 274
Limitation Act 1908 Article 91 Individuals are not challenging a device but are merely trying to avoid the legal effect of adding fraudulent Article 91, even if applicable.…
- AMJED ALI KHAN v. RAJ KUMAR DAS 1956 PLD 277
144 and 144 of the Limits Act, 1908, invading the evidence under Article 142 between the tenant occupying the land outside the tenant's tenancy and claiming the right to rent.…
- SHEIKH AYEZUDDIN v. PRIYA SANKAR CHOUDHURY 1956 PLD 280
Civil Code 1908 Section 148 of the Code of Conduct requires something to be done under the decree and a time limit set by it…
- MUHAMMAD REZZANULLAH KHAN v. ABUL KHAYER 1956 PLD 285
Civil Code 1908 Section 24 of the Code of Conduct gave Judge Moto Moto his authority to transfer a case from his court to another court in the East Bengal Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1950.…
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.