Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1968
70 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1968.
- THE STATE v. BHULU 1968 PCRLJ 38
Section with with with read in Pakistan Panel Code Section 1?1 // read, Exception Mur killings were all lonely and unarmed but the assailants are two in number and armed with daggers after exchanging …
- AYESHA KHATUN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 53
Evidence Act 24 of the Evidence Act 1872 Proof of confession proves to be overwhelming evidence and circumstances There is nothing in the record to accept the contrary view, if it is voluntary and tru…
- MOFIZUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 76
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 145 deals with the question of possession only, and the background of the prosecutor's case, not the title, however, cannot be ignored verbally. On the addition…
- MANSUR ENGINEERING WORKS LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/SALES TAX, EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PTD 90
Sales Tax Act 1951 Section 7 (1) Read with Notification No. 10, Date 27 6 51, Item No. 15 Iron Foundry Products Exception Product: (1) Rice Hiller Shells; (2) Hand Pump; (3) Hand Pump plungers; (4) CI…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. MESSRS KARAM ALI INDUSTRIES, MYMENSINGH 1968 PTD 95
Registration of the Partnership Firm Partnership Deed implemented on the Income Tax Act 1922 Section 26 7 4 1959 cannot be allowed to apply for the entire accounting year 1959 60 but from the date of …
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. MESSRS MOBARRAK CLOTH STORES, SYLHET 1968 PTD 96
Claims for registration of termination of the contract of execution of the Income Tax Act 1922, 1 1960 1960 cannot be allowed for the claim for registration ending on 31 12 1959; 1960…
- K. M. ZAINUR RAHMAN v. THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PCRLJ 116
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 r 32 (1) (6) Detained leaders of WAPDA employees' secret meeting called for a secret meeting and decided to strike the generals with the intention of paralyzing the powe…
- ABDUL AZIZ ALIAS GBDA v. THB STATE 1968 PCRLJ 145
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 36 Jud7 Judgment Court Having held only one point on whether each of the accused is guilty of a crime that requires conviction, the decision as a whole is not …
- DR. JAMSHED BAKTH v. AMEENUR RASHID CHAUDHURY 1968 PCRLJ 250
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section High High9 The jurisdiction to amend the High Court is not limited to questions of law only. Violations or serious injustice or even failure to do justice:…
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. PROMODE CHANDRA MAZUMDAR 1968 PTD 253
Bengal Agricultural Income Tax Act 1944 Section 65 is not restricted to the jurisdiction of the Civil Court if the Agricultural Income Tax Officer operates without any jurisdiction, in excess of the l…
- MESSRS INLAND NAVIGATION Co. LTD., CHITTAGONG v. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, COMPANIES CIRCLE, CHITTAGONG 1968 PTD 257
The Income Tax Act 1922 Section 23, 30, 33 and 35 error assessment records show that the Assessment Order is corrected under Section 35, the original order of the Assessment is changed by the order of…
- MESSRS GREEN v. THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 1968 PCRLJ 259
C Customs Act 1878 Section 167 (8) (6), read with the Imports and Exports (Control) Act (Exxon X of 1950), Section 3 (3) Contractor's Seed Contractor's Seed Containing Import Wheat The record of what …
- ABDUS SUBHANVV v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 263
Charges read with Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 221 Section 225 and the details of the charge of the Department of Law release details, not so content that the accused in the charge of preju…
- KHORSHED GHARAMI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 274
Pakistan Penal Code Section 320, plastered hands and feet sitting on the eighth grave injury, was kept in hospital for 10 days, then sent back home after 3 months with plaster removal advice, 3 Contin…
- ABUL HASHEM DEWAN v. S. D. O., MADARIPURS. 1968 PCRLJ 280
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 146 When a recipient of a drug is appointed after the entire drug, the magistrate either finds no party or discovers which of them was not the owner of the prop…
- ABDUS SATTAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 290
Section 467 of the Pakistan Penal Code was read with Article 34 for making fake documents and forging fake documents and forging fake documents. Under Section 34, the actual responsibility for the off…
- ABUL HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 300
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 141, 147 and 148 Section 99 have been read with illegal assembly. Neither party has any special possession and they both have the right to cut the grass from the ground. B…
- ASMAT ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 309
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 154 is the first information to be substantiated, and can only be used to endorse or contradict statements made in the FIR, on the basis of which it does not co…
- MOHIUDDIN AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 332
Selected by the Pakistan Criminal Code (Amendment) Act (XL of 1958), Sections 2 and 6 (5) of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 409, and the East Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Rules, r 3, by criminal…
- MESSRS CAREW & Co. LTD. DARSANA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PTD 384
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 10 (2) (iii) Foreign Residential Company Estimation of Business Expenses The interest paid on capital borrowing in a foreign country, which is assessed by Assisi, for field…
- MESSRS RAHIMI COMPANY v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1968 PTD 392
Income Tax Act 1922 read with Section 22 Martial Law Regulation (CMLA) No. 43 as declared under MLR No. 48, Sections 2 (i) and 3 (i) as amended \ MLR No. 43. Actual income to be treated separately as …
- WAHIDUDDIN AHMAD v. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, INVESTIGATION CIRCLE I, DACCA 1968 PTD 395
Read with Income Tax Act 1922 Sections 28 and 34 Section 23 (2) Income Tax Authorities is not obligated by the Income Tax Authorities to have complete freedom to obtain material against the reviewer b…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. MESSRS MURLIDHAR BENICHAND, SAIDPUR 1968 PTD 397
Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Officer 1922 Section 34 (1), Income Tax Officer Income Tax Officer Income Tax Officer, based on direct information collected from the books of the account presented befo…
- MESSRS SHAMIM & Co., DACCA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1968 PTD 401
Sections 31 and 34 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1922, the second case for the year ended 30 6 1951, completed on the original assessment 30 8 1954, as a result of appeals before the Appellate Assistant C…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. Md. QUDRUTULLAH 1968 PTD 411
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 26 Registration of Firm Partnership of Partnership 1 4 1956 was formed as a result of an oral agreement of a contract to be entered into a written agreement with the Consen…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN , DACCA v. MESSRS AMEER BUX METAL INDUSTRIES, DACCA 1968 PTD 414
Sales tax act 1951 read with section 7 notification number 9, dated 27 6 51, item number 15 under the process of hammering water tank manufactured with GI sheets, exempted from sales tax.…
- MRS. QUDSIA BEGUM v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1968 PTD 416
Section 16 (2) of section 16 (2) of the Income Tax Act reads with section 49C (2) (iii) that the dividend income company declares a profit and credits it to the shareholders' account. After a year, th…
- MOHINI MILLS LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN DACCA 1968 PTD 418
The income tax act read with section 18 (3B), section 10 (2) (iii) of 1922, does not show anything on the source of interest on the capital for the purposes of business that the assessee has either on…
- MESSRS YASIN (EAST PAKISTAN) LTD., CHITTAGONG v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1968 PTD 421
Under section 10 (2) (xvi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, under section 10 (2) (xvi), the penalties imposed for violations of customs regulation and penalties for violating the law. No allowance can be …
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. MESSRS EASTERN ALUMINIUM AGENCY, DACCA 1968 PTD 442
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 34 Income Avoidance Estimate Whether certain income of the Assessee from a source is unknown and not associated with any leading source of profit making activity after whic…
- MESSRS PERFUME SUPPLY Co. MITFORD, DACCA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1968 PTD 447
The Income Tax Act 1922 is read with section 15AA section 16 (1), 55, 56 and 58. In addition to the tax, its total income must be deducted…
- GANESH CHANDRA SIL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 462
East Pakistan Pure Food Ordinance 1959 Section 44 Section 44 does not itself constitute a crime but determines the penalties for the offenses mentioned in the various provisions of the ordinance. Can …
- ABDUL KARIM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 477
Pakistan Penal Code Section 6 366 Abduction Witness A Abducted Woman, Essential Witness Evidence of such a person, though no intention was made, but abduction was not proved by Section 6 366 for illeg…
- A. SALAM A SATTAR v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1968 PTD 503
The Income Tax Act 1922 refers to section 16 (2) given in section 49C (2) (iii) read with section 49C (2) (iii) section 16 (2) and the entire word has to be read. Is related to paid, paid or reinforce…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. MESSRS NARAYANGANJ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, NARAYANGANJ 1968 PTD 513
Section 4 (3) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the main purpose of the diagnostic body for promoting, promoting and protecting trade, commerce and industry and Pakistan, is the kind of thing that has …
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. MESSRS Sree GOVINDA BHANDAR, MYMENSINGH 1968 PTD 519
Registration of firm with effect from the date of implementation of the Income Tax Act 1922 Section 26 Partnership process.…
- MESSRS PIONEER BANK LTD. IN LIQUIDATION OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, DACCA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1968 PTD 520
Section 24 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, is a continuation of the business, held by the bank, which is necessary to claim the loss from the total income, not properly and against the interest-earne…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. MESSRS GULISTAN CINEMA Co.,- DACCA 1968 PTD 523
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 10 (2) (v) Existing repairs require repairs arising after long intervals or intervals of years. Such repairs will still be existing repairs. Has replaced such flooring. Rep…
- RAJAT KUNDA ALIAS RANAJIT v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 529
Pakistan panel code section 366 abduction teen age and love affair, love not rejected…
- HARI PADA DEBNATH ALIAS UARIA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 569
Evidence Act 1872 Section 24 confessing crime and assault being committed under the advice of the police before committing the magistrate but not before the magistrate confessing guilt. And despite re…
- THE LUNGLA (SYLHET) TEA Co. LTD., CHITTAGON v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1968 PTD 570
The Business Profit Tax Act 1947 reads with Section 2 (1) (a) R2A, Schedule II and Business Profit Tax Rules, r 4, correcting 40% of the Tea Company's Estimated Distribution (Allowance) deduction…
- MOFIZUR RAHMAN CHOWDHURY v. SERAJUL MOSTAFA 1968 PCRLJ 599
Article 145 Prevention of Conflict Peace Violation on Intangible Property The decision of the Magistrate to decide on evidence relating to the possession of the property in an action that is genuine a…
- RANI BILKIS BANOO ALIAS BEGUM BILKIS CHOWDHURY v. SYED NURUL ALAM 1968 PCRLJ 619
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 144 to prevent the threat of a breach of the peace must be passed after a prior notification to the affected person, except in the case of a natural justice rul…
- RAFIQUE ALIAS RAFIQUL ALAM KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 645
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 147, 148, 149; 2 302 // & And Intention 326 Murder With Joint Intention Two accused, armed with daggers, five bangs and three empty-handed suspects carry all the dead bodi…
- MESSRS ATA HUSSAIN KHAN LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1968 PTD 667
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 23 Profit Rate There is no comparable business in the province whose profitability rate was very low through scrutiny, without any case.…
- SHAHJAHAN ALI SHEIKH v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PCRLJ 672
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 Detention Detenu is charged with: (i) belonging to a political party; (ii) a member of the reception committee to receive some political leaders; Controlled by, such mat…
- AZIZA KHATUN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 682
Section 228, sections 4 (m), 28 and 480, read with the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 228, PPC's request for assistance in judicial proceedings by civil, criminal or taxation courts onl…
- THE STATE v. ANSAR ALI BISWAS 1968 PCRLJ 696
Pakistan Penal Code Section 300, Exception l The grave and sudden provocation, though serious, cannot be considered a sudden matter as it was 2/3 days ago, with the exception of section 300 under I. N…
- RABIUL ISLAM v. GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PCRLJ 716
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 r 32 Detention contents which were: (i) President of a town committee of the opposition party. (ii) affiliated with political parties and labor movements, cannot attract…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. A. KHALEQUE 1968 PTD 724
By way of exemption on section 15D donations to the Income Tax Act 1922…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA ZONE, DACCA v. MESSRS RELIABLE MILL STORES, DINAJPUR 1968 PTD 729
Income Tax Rules 1962 Income Tax Rules, 1962, r 6 (2) Read with the Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), Section 22 (1A) Registration of Contribution Registration date not entered on the fixed date ie 15 7 19…
- MESSRS AZIZ MOTORS (FIRM) v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1968 PTD 731
The exercise of discretion contemplated by Section 45 read with the Income Tax Act 1922 Section 45 Income Tax Manual, Part III, page 227 may appear from the specific order on the request or after the …
- TOFAZZAL HOSSAIN v. THIS PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PCRLJ 734
Defense of Pakistan Rules 1965 Defense of Pakistan Rules, 1965, r 52 As amended in 1966, Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 6, Fundamental Rights No. 4 was read under Rule 52, against the order …
- MESSRS ATA HUSSAIN KHAN LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX DACCA 1968 PTD 735
Under the Income Tax Act 1922 section 10 and 28 Assessment Procedures section 10 case was initiated two years after the expiry of the assessment year, one of which is exempt from the applicable sectio…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA ZONE, DACCA v. MESSRS RELIABLE MACHINERY STORES, DINAJPUR 1968 PTD 738
Income tax rules 1962 r 6 (2), words read with section 22 (1A), income tax act (XI of 1922), renewal of registration of contribution r 6 (2) means the date specified in clause a) Section 22 (1A) appli…
- ABDUL BAREK AKOND v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 799
Pakistan Penal Code Section 6 376 Rape-age girl violated extreme ruthlessness to fulfill the wishes of older accused resulting in the death sentence for years. Not strict, despite the gruesomeness of …
- MUHAMMAD MIA v. MOTAHAR ALI MIA 1968 PCRLJ 842
Crimes pertaining to Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 1 561A under Section A 54AA and E 74E continue to be processed internally, mechanically operated by the `Vessels Act (I of 1917) '. Is…
- ABDUL KHALEK PATWARY v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 869
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 161 and 165 illegal abusive bribery less disgusting…
- FAZLUL HAQ KARI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 891
Kathi equipped with Pakistan Penal Code Section 148 riot weapons is generally not considered a deadly weapon.…
- THE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, KARACHI v. ANIL KUMAR GHOSE 1968 PTD 907
Duty obligation preceding the enactment of the State Duty Act 1950 Section 57 (1956) The Controller is not required to accept the prices laid by the respondent in relation to agricultural land also th…
- HASHU ALIAS HASU v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 920
Pakistan Penal Code Section ???au detained such person on the basis of missing evidence of the crime or knowing that the murder was committed to remove the body from one place to another. Gone is the …
- TAMIZUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1047
Approval of separate convictions under sections 147 and 324 of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 147 and 324, not legal…
- ABDUL KADER TALUKDAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1273
The Pakistan Penal Code section 161 reads with Section 5 (1), The Prevention of Corruption (Second of 1947) imprisonment is punishable by Rs. 2500, which reduces the imprisonment from one year to 4 mo…
- MUHAMMAD SHAMSUL HOQUE v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1301
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 237 accused, originally charged with crime under Section 120B, on PPC evidence record shows that the accused has been convicted of committing a crime 420, pp: c…
- ABDUL GAFUR ALIAS ABDUL GAFUR SARKAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1335
Section 6 (5) of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1958, at the time of the commission of a crime held in the office of the President of the Union Board and at the time the crime was identifi…
- AKHTAR ALI SAYRD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1563
Pakistan Penal Code Section 414 expresses the essence, the ingredients and the intention to steal his property or knows the reason meaning the word believes the word needs to show a stronger situation…
- NEKI MIAH FAKIR ALIAS MUHAMMAD NEKI MIAH FAKIR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1579
Sections 50 and 55 of the Press and Publication Ordinance, 1960, publications of East Pakistan Public Safety, Ordinance (LXXVIII of 1958), section 7 (3) and the Defense of Pakistan Rules, 1965, rr 32 …
- AMENA BEGUM v. THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PCRLJ 1595
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Husband's request for rehabilitation of section 488 for caregiver alleges that he divorced his wife three times by announcing her divorce and filing for divorce. Has no…
- SYED MUHAMMAD ABDUL QUDDUS v. WADUDUR RAHMAN KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1631
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 256 The Prosecutor can examine the witnesses and cannot testify that the cross-examination of the witnesses is carried out by the accused.…
- MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1857
Pakistan Penal Code Section 457/511 Attempted to break into houses at night, the accused was found punching in the outer wall of the complainant's cow and was detained by the prosecution witnesses. It…
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.