Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1950
19 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1950.
- MAZAHARUL HAQUE v. CROWN 1950 PLD 4
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Section 364 The abductor was in fact kidnapped even though he could be charged under appropriate charge where the prosecution is concerned that the kidnapp…
- AKHIL ALI MULLA v. KING 1950 PLD 6
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Article 395 False accusations in the law If, if the participants are less than five, under section 395 the offense requires at least five participants, obv…
- SK. ANWAR ALI- v. CROWN 1950 PLD 7
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, the Prevention of Corruption Act, (II of 1947) was granted by a competent authority before admitting the crime but was not actually presented until the accused.…
- NURAL ISLAM AZIZI v. CROWN 1950 PLD 9
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898) Section 161 Section 161 read with Section 5 (2) under Charge Act 11 under the Pakistan Penal Code 1944 Subsequent Charges to be Reve…
- ABDUL SOBHAN BHUYA v. WASIN BHUYA 1950 PLD 11
For lumbermen…
- MOFIZUDDIN DEWAN V v. CROWNV 1950 PLD 16
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) SS, 297, 537 Failure to examine 3 witnesses before a magistrate in the absence of a proper direction for the jury by a Sessions Judg…
- THE CROWN v. SATISH CHARAN DAS 1950 PLD 21
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Sections 307 and 326 The defendant's plea, that the crime was found to be abruptly provoked the punishment of grave and sudden provocation where there was …
- SANTOSH KUMAR DHAR v. CROWN 1950 PLD 23
Section 361 of the Pakistan Penal Code (A) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860) cannot be proven with accuracy less than sixteen years. The crime of abduction cannot be overcome. The calculation is about 1…
- SULTAN AHMAD v. CROWN 1950 PLD 27
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) (a) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898) Section 288 allows the defense of the testimony of witnesses to the sessions magistrate's testimony, and neither the scrutiny nor…
- SM. JOSHODA SUNDARI DEBI v. SUMANTA CHANDRA KANGSHA BANIKYA 1950 PLD 31
Sections 81 and 82 of the Transfer of Restitution Act (I82 of I82) of the Property Act 1882 make no claim through partnership or marshalling with a mortgage or the auction buyer on the sale of the mor…
- ABDUL GHANI v. KHESTA MOHAN ROY 1950 PLD 33
CPC Review Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908) Submission of Application for Separation of Sale Under Rule 1 Section 174 (3), Bengal Tenancy Act (VIII of 1885) The court is…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX. BENGAL MUFUSSIL v. BURDHAN KUTI WARD\'S ESTATE 1950 PLD 34
Income Tax Act 1922 Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), Sections 2 (1) and S, 4 (3) Land lease to the Chief Refugee Administrator for temporary residence of refugees is not a compulsory acquisition lease, Sa…
- MOKHAIR-UD-DIN KHAN v. EMPEROR 1950 PLD 41
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) Sections 296 and 423 The head of the charge, which is more than recorded, commands the trial before a judge where 30 lines An average…
- AZIZ-UR-RAHMAN v. MANIK-UD-DIN AHUED 1950 PLD 43
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Criminal Procedure (V9 1898) Section 133 Trees standing or threatening to damage walls and kitchens…
- NURUL FAKIR v. THE KING 1950 PLD 50
Evidence Act 1872 was not recovered from Section 114 and 133 of the accused under Section 395 of the Evidence Act (of 1872) co Defective evidence of confession and association of evidence evidence Sec…
- JINNAT ALI v. JINNAT ALI 1950 PLD 53
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Section 364 Fraudulent Prosecution Prosecutors prove that tea was cheated and misappropriated as a result of plot murder and misappropriation of kidnapped …
- BIR BIKRAM, KISHORE MANIKYA BAHADUR v. ABUAL KAMAL MUHAMMAD SADEQUE CHOWDHURY 1950 PLD 56
Civil procedure code 1908 Civil procedure code (v. 1908) Section 86 (5) Section 149, (3) suit, under the Bengal Tenancy Act, it is not necessary to decide against the Chief Consent of the representati…
- AMRESH CHANDRA ROY CHAUDHRY v. PROMILA SUNDARI ROY CHAUDHURANI 1950 PLD 60
CPC Review Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908) A XLVII, r 1 `New bargaining matter matters terms of riots Explanation of expatriate woman Explaining women to whom the terms…
- MADAR CHANDRA GOLDAR v. MANINDRA NATH GOLDAR 1950 PLD 63
Bengal Agricultural Lenders Act 1936 Bengal Agricultural Lenders Act (VII of 1936) Decisions 20 and 45 of the Debt Settlement Board deal with the jurisdiction of the civil court to decide whether the …
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.