Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1960
59 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1960.
- MESSRS OCTAVIOUS STEEL & Co. LTD. CALCUTTA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX DACCA 1960 PTD 1
Section 42 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, denies all income received from sources in taxable areas, whether as an Assistive Resident or non-Resident Commission and outside Pakistan through the Asses…
- IMAN ALI HALSANA v. FURKUN ALI MONDAL 1960 PLD 3
Civil Procedure Code Order XPL appeals to the original Order O XXII, r 4, subr (4) [as incorporated by notification by the Calcutta High Court in the Calcutta Gazette on 2 April 1938] Supplementary Co…
- MOKSED ALI MOLLA v. THE STATE 1960 PLD 13
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 342 highlights the circumstances and characteristics of the case should be presented to the accused for any explanation he or she may be asked whether he wi…
- MD. MAGDU BHUIYA v. JABBAN HUQ 1960 PLD 15
Section 4 of the Partition Act 1893 drew attention not only to the suit set by the alien buyer but also to the suit set up by a partner.…
- JNANENDRA NATH BISWAS v. MAKBUL HOSSAIN SIKDAR 1960 PLD 19
Pakistan Penal Code Section 193 The crime is completed as soon as the counterfeiting is completed…
- LAL MIA v. AHMEDULLAH MIAN 1960 PLD 23
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 243 shall be recorded in the words of the accused as it was used under which the offense committed under this section cannot be recorded in accordance with the …
- PRABHAT CHANDRA BHATTACHARJEE v. PRABHAT CHANDRA BHATTACHARJEE 1960 PLD 26
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 145 and 192 Independent District Magistrates themselves may pass a transfer order to any authorized Magistrate Transfer Magistrate passing a preliminary order …
- MD. NUR HUSSAIN v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1960 PLD 31
The notice of section 3 of the acquisition of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act, 1948, in which the property is being used for a particular purpose, is not issued unless the public purpose is e…
- ABDUL KARIM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1960 PLD 42
Railway Act 1890 Section 72 Goods are not negotiated by rail, without the consent of the consignor, in the long run, that is, the deviation of risk note goods is not exempt from Bailey's general legal…
- DUD MEHER BIBI v. ABDUL GAFUR 1960 PLD 46
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 488 (3), (5) Failure to obtain order cancellation for husband's restitution, he does not refrain from filing an objection under section (3) before issuing magi…
- CHAPALA SUNDARI DEVI v. WAHED ALI 1960 PLD 50
The CPC appearance and non-submission of civil procedure code Order IX resulted in a pre-order, O 13, r 13 fraudulent litigation, aside from the fact that the claim was false or for any reason Without…
- RANGALAL SUTRADHAR v. SATISH CHANDRA PODDAR 1960 PLD 52
Evidence Act 1872 dies in section 32 (5) of the document describing himself as the widow of R.…
- ABDUL SHAH v. AFSARUDDIN MOLLAH 1960 PLD 64
Pakistan Penal Code Section 379 Intention to take dishonestly without consent is not dishonest…
- INDIA GENERAL NAVIGATION AND RAILWAY CO., LTD v. NOOR MUHAMMAD 1960 PLD 66
The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 100 shall not constitute a party to appeal for appeal, with the permission of the court, preferring further appeal against the lower appellate court decision.…
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI v. SHANTILAL BRIJ LAL 1960 PLD 72
The entire supply of goods or parts supplied by implementation of Risk Notes A and B of the Railway Act 1890, to show the Railway to show how the goods were disposed of during the delivery or risk of …
- NADIRAM MAL (MALLICK) v. LAKSHMAN CHANDRA DHALI 1960 PLD 76
The application for approval of the Securities 17 Provisions of the Commonwealth Small Courts Act, 1887, was not made in accordance with the earlier, but at the same time, following the compliance of …
- PAKISTAN TRADING COMPANY v. M. M. ISPAHANI, LTD. 1960 PLD 81
Termination of Arbitration Powers Arbitration Act 1940 Section 5 In order to revoke arbitration authority, the court has to exercise its discretion in discharging under Section 5 of the Arbitration Ac…
- COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME, TAX,EAST BENGAL v. JADU PRAMANIK 1960 PLD 103
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 If a claimant relief can be sued against any person who wishes to deny the title of the plaintiff, the plaintiff vendor executed the third person in favor of the sa…
- ALI AHMED v. HALADHAR DEB NATH 1960 PLD 110
Transactions not found by the Bengal Agricultural Lenders Act 1936 Section 34 Board The civil court has the power to decide whether the transaction is a loan or not.…
- MIARUDDIN BHUIYAN v. SALEH MEHER BIBI 1960 PLD 120
Mahmud La Habana Bill can be considered as simple junk for not understanding the process is stable…
- RITH KARAN v. M. ZAMAN (MAGISTRATE, 1ST CLASS, RANGPUR) 1960 PLD 129
The procedure of section 6 of the East Pakistan (Control of essential commodities) Act 1956 is to stand trial, the maximum punishment provided in Section 6 of the East Pakistan Control of Goods Act 19…
- MANSUR AHMED v. DAKSHINA CHANDRA SEN 1960 PLD 130
Article 173 (3) is not one of the application proceedings, read with provisions 141 of the OX, r 9, CPC, the CPC applicable to the maintenance of such application was excluded by default.…
- MESSRS THE CHANDPUR MILLS LTD. v. MESSRS THE ECONOMIC AID CORPORATION 1960 PLD 141
Provincial Injustice Act 1920 Section 51 Decision as Borrowers 0 JSF Asian Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 64 Companies Act (VII of 1913), Section 229…
- TRANS,OCEANIC STEAMSHIP CO., LTD., KARACHI v. ABDUL RAZAK, ABDUL KADER 1960 PLD 147
The goods shipped to i Dipper \ Shipping Company are not exempt from all liability contract act (IX of 1872), sections 151 and 152…
- S. N. GUPTA & CO. v. SADANANDA GHOSH 1960 PLD 153
Discrimination through specific performance or decree Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O XXXX, RR 1 and 2 of the Specific Relief Act (1 of 1877) & 54 & 55 55…
- SHEIK SHAHMAT ALI v. SAHAR ALI 1960 PLD 170
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 145 Magistrate can stop proceedings at any stage If he is satisfied that there is no possibility of breach of the peace, he is not obliged to provide the parti…
- MESSRS ABDUL RAHMAN,ABDUL GANI v. MESSRS KARACHI STEAM NAVIGATION CO. LTD. 1960 PLD 173
Freight Carriage Through Maritime 1925 Article III, r 6 Application for a ship-cargo contract is limited, the carrier is in custody after the ship is finished, new liability and filing limit 3 It will…
- BIRENDRA KUMAR CHOWDHURY v. THE STATE 1960 PLD 184
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 514 Bond Bonds The magistrate is not authorized to impose a bond strictly when the next hearing has been postponed by the High Court.…
- ABDUL RAHMAN GAZI v. THE STATE 1960 PLD 187
Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) section 326 (2) (a) [as amended by the Code of Conduct (East Bengal Amendment) Act (XXV of 1953]) to Juror, a resident of the same subdivision. The execution of the tria…
- AFIZALI v. THE STATE 1960 PLD 197
Sections 436 and 437 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) District Magistrate or Additional District Magistrate have the authority to appoint a first class magistrate's order.…
- THE SUPERINTENDENT AND REMEMBRANCER OFLEGAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN v. SYED BAZLUR RAHMAN 1960 PLD 200
East Pakistan Food (Special Courts) 1956 Special Magistrate Lower Appellate Court upholding an appeal without jurisdiction and against the order to be acquitted under section 417, the second order of …
- SHAMSUDDIN AHMED v. THE STATE 1960 PLD 205
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section e e2 Proper way of trial whether the accused wishes to include defense evidence If the court examines the accused under section 342 of the Code of Criminal Proc…
- HABIBAR RAHMAN SERANG v. THE STATE 1960 PLD 213
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 243 shall be recorded in the words of the accused as it was used under which the offense committed under this section cannot be recorded in accordance with the …
- MANIRUDDIN MALLIK, ALIAS MANNU MALLIK v. SHAIKH ABBAS 1960 PLD 217
Habitat Ijaz can submit a document for registration under section 35 (1) (c) of the Registration Act 1908, including the person claiming to be registered under the document.…
- YUSUF ALI MONDAL v. LOKMAN SARKAR 1960 PLD 225
Section 26G application operates under Article 181 and not Article 131, by the Limitation Act (IX of 1908)…
- AHMED SHAH KHAN v. ABDUL BARKAT 1960 PLD 225
Section 116 of the Evidence Act 1872 cannot deny the title of landlord during the continuation of the leasehold tenancy between the landlord and the tenant involved.…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN v. NABADWIP CHANDRA-HARAN CHANDRA SAHA 1960 PTD 249
Section 66 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, is a question of law whether the partition of the Hindu family was affected by the partition and that it was established as a firm but not the question of f…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN v. RADHASHYAM AGAR WALA 1960 PTD 253
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 2 (11) (i) CL (C) The Legislative Evaluation Year The Legislature may legislate or delegate it to a competent authority so as to make a regular estimate in the case of newl…
- A. SAMAD KHAN v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 1960 PTD 274
Sales Tax Act 1951 Sections 2 (11) and 2 (l5) Manufacturer or Producer and Sales Definition Sales Tax Act (III of 1951), Section 2 (11), Proviso Application…
- MUHAMMAD YOUSUFF v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST BENGAL 1960 PTD 280
Section 23 (3) and 13 of the Income Tax Act 1922 are embodied in section 13 (3).…
- SATISH CHANDRA BISWAS v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST BENGAL 1960 PTD 292
The order passed by the High Court under section 66 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1922, section 66 (2) and 66A (2) of section 66A (2) is not a final order and thus the High Court is not present. Not eligi…
- THE VIKRAMPUR TEA INDUSTRY Co., LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EAST BENGAL 1960 PTD 301
The application for reference under section 66 (1), (2) and (3) of the Income Tax Act 1922, section 66 (1) of the ICC, has been rejected by the Appellate Tribunal as time barred. (3) and not under sec…
- ASSAM-BENGAL CEMENT Co. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1960 PTD 379
Section 10 (2) (xvi) section 10 (2) (xvi) of the Income Tax Act cannot be deducted to determine the nature of capital expenditures, whether the income to be charged or not. Or capital expenditure…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. MESSRS HOOSEN KASAM DADA, KARACHI 1960 PTD 574
The Business Profit Tax is governed by the limitation period set forth by section 11 and section 11 by section 14 of the Tax Act 1947 [before the amendment of the Finance Act (I of 1957)]…
- CHAND MIAH v. INCOME-TAX AND SALES-TAX OFFICER II, NARAYANGANJ CIRCLE 1960 PTD 580
Alternative and effective treatment provided by the High Court's exclusive jurisdiction is not written except in the absence or excess of jurisdiction or where alternative treatment is the strict and …
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN v. MESSRS AIZUDDIN GAZI 1960 PTD 727
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 23 (4) Section 23 (2) Best review of decision without notice under section 23…
- BENGAL-BURMA STEAM NAVIGATION Co., Ltd. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1960 PTD 765
Section 4 (1) (a) and 42 of the Income Tax Act, 1922, which is received in Pakistan but not received outside Pakistan.…
- MESSRS UNITED BANK OF INDIA LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1960 PTD 768
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 4A (C) Controls and Management of Assisi (Bank) with Head Office in Calcutta Outside Pakistan, Income in India during the relevant year exceeds the income in Pakistan.…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST BENGAL v. MESSRS RASHID MOTORS, CHITTAGONG 1960 PTD 773
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 26 Whether an instrument of participation will be produced in the history of an ACC firm that is in existence by oral agreement.…
- DACCA TOBACCO STORES, DACCA: In re v. DACCA TOBACCO STORES, DACCA: In re 1960 PTD 992
Application for entry of original process found in tampering with the Income Tax Act 1922 section 26 entry should not be allowed…
- R. P. SAHA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST BENGAL 1960 PTD 1025
The notice sought by section 63 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, is presented under the provisions of the General Clause Act, in the absence of a written authority, in return for the employee who sign…
- VIKRAMPUR TEA INDUSTRY Co. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST BENGAL 1960 PTD 1032
Application for reference under section 66 (1) of section 66 (1) (2) (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1919, has been rejected by the appellate tribunal because the time restriction in such a case is appropr…
- UNION JUTE COMPANY LTD., NARAYANGANJ, In re v. UNION JUTE COMPANY LTD., NARAYANGANJ, In re 1960 PTD 1036
Sections 34 and 42 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, are exempted from the purchase of raw materials purchased in Pakistan and the profits made in India whether Pakistan is eligible for inter-domain ag…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BENGAL MUFASSIL v. BURDHAN KUTI WARDS\' ESTATE 1960 PTD 1050
Income Tax Act 1922 Sections 2 (1) and 4 (3) (viii) Waste land is leased to resident migrants Salami and annual rent received agricultural income not compensation, capital receipt or income…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. SATISH CHANDRA BHOWMIK 1960 PTD 1075
Able to inspect, approve, or amend the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Act 1922 Section 28 (6)…
- GOPINATH BISWAMBAR ROY v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA 1960 PTD 1079
Sections 22 (2), 23 (2), 23 (4) and 66 of the Income Tax Act 1922 are required to be filed for non-profit and loss account returns even if there is no return if in such a case the essential powers of …
- S. J. LAZARUS & CO. NARAYANGUNJ, DACCA v. S. J. LAZARUS & CO. NARAYANGUNJ, DACCA 1960 PTD 1119
The Income Tax Act, 1922, is one of the two partners of the notice firm pending adjournment reference to the High Court, in which there is no provision in the matter of partnership that the surviving …
- THE RAJNAGAR TEA Co., LTD., CALCUTTA v. THE COMMISSONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1960 PTD 1121
Section 10 (2) (xi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, is considered to be a resident of Pakistan because of the loss of value of Pakistan's currency due to debt from its managing agents in India. The deduc…
- R. SIM & Co. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 1960 PTD 1125
Business Profit Tax Act 1947 Sch II, r 2 (1) Capital Count Non-Annual Last Year Balance…
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.