Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1958
76 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1958.
- MAMTAJUDDIN KHAN v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 1
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 276 Proviso Second II 18 special jirgas were summoned, only 4 of the persons present in the court were selected to form a panel of 7 judges under which section …
- AZIZAN NESSA KHATOON v. ABUL HUSSAIN BHUIYA 1958 PLD 8
Limit Act 1908 Section 23 For the purpose of permanent structure erection on the route, it is not proper to continue the wrong test, nor to continue to remove the obstruction after some extent is not …
- MRS. KHAMA TAHERA BANU v. COMPENSATION OFFICER, GOVERNMENT OF EAST BENGAL 1958 PLD 15
Appeal to the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948, Section 7 Reading with East Bengal (Emergency) Property Rules 1948 application, r 9 (16) Appeal against the award of monthly compensation arbit…
- MOHAR ALI AND ANOTHER v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1958 PLD 17
East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1951 Section 3 (2) The Government is not entitled to take possession of the property owned by the tenant and the tenant - Notice No. 4845 LR, dated 2 Apri…
- SHAH MAFIZUDDIN AHMAD CHOWDHURY v. SHAH ASIRUDDIN CHOW DHURY 1958 PLD 19
Civil Procedure Code Order XVII and XVII, r 1 and section 105 (1) of the CPC Adjournments should take into account the difficulties of the parties when the order was adjourned to the postponement of t…
- MONGAL MUCH I v. ABU MUSA AHMAD MUSTAFA 1958 PLD 26
Civil Code 1908 Section 20 (c) of the Code cannot be purchased by amending a case for a cause of action which was not collected on the date of the suit institution, and which relates to the property i…
- NALINIKANTA GHOSH v. AFIRUDDIN AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 32
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 9 The appeal by the Court of Appeal Court has not been judicially examined and the High Court will also intervene in reviewing the question of fact, confirming t…
- SULTAN AHMED SHARIF v. MATHURA MOHAN CHOWDHURY 1958 PLD 36
Code of Conduct Implementing the Court to Take Notice of Occurring Occurrences in Rule 1908 Section 47 An Implementing Court may, of course, take notice of changed circumstances, but allow it to be ex…
- BHAGABAT RAJAN DAS v. SIDDHESWAR PAKRASHI 1958 PLD 43
Application of the Contract for Transfer and Lease of Section 110 of the Property Act 1882 110 A lease instrument is applicable only for leasing and not on lease agreement.…
- AHASANULLAH CHOWDHURY v. HAJI ABDUL JABBAR CHOWDHURY 1958 PLD 57
By comparing the signatures the Evidence Act 1872 Section 73 concluded that the second appeal on the question of fact cannot be interfered with section 100 in the Civil Procedure Code (h of 1908).…
- SALEHA KHATUN v. SIDDIKULLA 1958 PLD 62
It is unconditional for Mohammedan Law to withdraw from the divorce litigation…
- SYED SUJAT ALI v. SRIMATI LACHMAN BIBI 1958 PLD 68
Shares of the heirs of the partner law do not equate to the distribution of the inherited property of Mohammedan.…
- ASGAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 75
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 297, 298 and 299, confession and truth of question confession for sludge holuntarine5s…
- NIRODE CHANDRA BISWAS AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 90
There is no objection to the Criminal Law Amendment Act (XIX of 1948), section 5 (5) passed by the Superintendent of Police, its legal status raised in the trial court trial in the Order Editions Act …
- MACKINNON MACKENZIE & CO. OF PAKISTAN TD v. MESSRS DADA LTD., KHATUNGANJ 1958 PLD 101
Loading port of goods outside Pakistan, which is not specified under section 4 of the Carry Bye Act, 1925, which is not specified under section 4, is prohibited even if the bill of lading makes it ill…
- A. K. M. REZA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 111
Article 197 Legislation for the sanction of civil servants, when necessary, for the prosecution of a civil servant under section 197, no question of sanction under the Code of Criminal Procedure can b…
- ABUL KASEM ALIAS MD. ABUL KASEM AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 115
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 298 Duty of Jury Judge to Identify Contradictions and Contradictions in Evidence of Witnesses…
- HAJI MAJIBUR RAHMAN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 136
Criminal proceedings under section 77 and 82 of the Registration Act, 1908, pending civil suit pending under section 82, joint proceedings in the dispute criminal proceedings withheld.…
- YUSUF ALI CHOWDHURY AND OTHERS v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1958 PLD 138
The East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1951 section 20 (2) (b) (ii) words do not include cap and market in cultivated land The word of competence indicates that the land is cultivated witho…
- ABDUL NOOR ALIAS NUR MEAH v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 145
Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, which is not allowed to be investigated by a police officer, is not allowed for trial. The report of such police officer shall be under section 190…
- SUDDHA SARDAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 154
Evidence Act 1872 Section 3 (2) The meaning and interpretation of the words presented for the examination of the court are presented in accordance with the provisions of the Evidence Act, as a documen…
- ZAINAL ABEDIN v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 167
The Pakistan Penal Code section 21 (10) is performing the duties as specified in clause (10).…
- SUKLAL LASKAR v. SURENDRA MOHAN SAHA AND ANOTHER 1958 PLD 174
Unlawful possession of a widow, even if the Reverser Litigation Act (IX of 1908) works against Article 141…
- NAGENDRA NATH MAJUMDAR v. KSHITISH CHANDRA GHOSE 1958 PLD 179
CPC Procedure and Adjustment of Suits Civil Procedure Code Order XXIII OXX III, r 3 Compromise was to include compromise in the proper procedure in the case of departing from the scope of the judgment…
- DALURAM BAHANI v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 188
The subject of a specific notification, in addition to publication in the Official Gazette, should also be communicated separately to other persons related to the Rules of Rule 19.…
- PEER BAKSH v. RABIA KHATUN AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 198
The Mohammedan Law is invalid to make the bill bill unnecessary. Under Muhammadan law, two conditions must be agreed so that the habeas bill will be validated, namely, (1) the actual payment by the co…
- MUHAMMAD MAHDI ALI KHAN PANNI AND OTHERS v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER 1958 PLD 203
East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 Section 3 (1) (2) Dedicated, dedicated children and for the first time Constitution 18 (b), the Constitution is a religious institution in the sense …
- FAKKU MIA ALIAS MOTAHAR ALI KHAN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 240
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) comprises a joint trial of 237 and 239 in violation of the provisions of Sections 236 and 239 and Section 537 Conventions (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 / 120B and 396…
- ABDUL HAKIM v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 253
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 235 (1) It is not necessary to know the time and place difference between the commission of a single transaction. The prosecution can be tried together…
- ABDUR RAHIM SIKDER v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 257
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 239 (d) is to set the usual criteria for setting the limits of a transaction to determine whether a particular crime or crime is committed during the same trans…
- ELLERMAN & BUCNALL STEAMSHIP CO., LTD. v. SHAHIDI TRADING CORPORATION, LTD 1958 PLD 276
Sales tax payments on the purchase of goods on Sections 3 and 27 of the Sales Tax Act 1951 are not responsible for such payment as a short landed landlord carrier.…
- AJIT KUMAR DAS v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1958 PLD 280
Article 15 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1956 gives the court the power to examine whether the acquisition of property was made for public purpose, Article 15 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan…
- GANESH CHANDRA BASU v. BASHU LASKER AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 295
The court has the natural jurisdiction over the court to obtain the fraudulent award, so that it has a regular jurisdiction to determine the decree obtained by the fraud with the execution of the part…
- THE SUPERINTENDENT AND REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL AFFAIRS; GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN v. RAGRBAT ALI AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 301
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 276 jurors are not required to select many in case of a shortage of students when they choose among the people present in the court…
- SIDDIK AHMED KHAN v. GURA MEAN KHAN 1958 PLD 308
Section 19, 25, 33 and 28 awards of the Bengal Agricultural Lenders Act 1936 are payable on one day by installments provided by the Debt Settlement Board. The registration was made on a different date…
- THE SANGBAD NEWSPAPER AND NASIRUDDIN AHMED v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1958 PLD 324
Press (Emergency Powers) Act 1931 Section 7 (3) Order to demand security from a newspaper on some basis to introduce new grounds in its statement to the court to verify the order, where the provincial…
- HART MEAN v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 333
East Pakistan Food (Special Courts) Special Court under the Special Magistrate Act of 1956 does not mean criminal procedure, Code of the Special Magistrate does not appear under the special code of co…
- MUHAMMAD NURUL HAQ MIA v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 341
Nature of the Pakistan Panel Code Section 193 Proof Duty of the prosecution In order to convict an individual under Section 193 of the Pakistan Penal Code, the prosecution must prove not only that he …
- BABAR ALI BISWAS AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 347
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 239 (d) Articles 147 and 342, the trial of two separate and separate criminal charges under the Penal Code did not take place during the same transaction.…
- RAHMATULLAH AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 350
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 441 and 448 criminal error…
- AMINAR RAHMAN v. SHAUKAT ALI 1958 PLD 356
Sections 18 and 21 of the Evidence Act 1872 When an admission with a defendant is jointly interested in a defendant, it is not necessary to withhold the admission of the previous case by the joint def…
- DR. KAZI HABIBUL ISLAM v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 362
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 190 (1) (b) Magistrate has the power to confess a serious crime even on a police report…
- LAKSHMAN MANDAL AND OTHERS v. MOSLEM UDDIN SARDAR 1958 PLD 366
Section 23 (b) read with Section 40 Special Relief Act of the Contract Act 1872 The personal agreement assigned under the intention to express or contradict the benefit of the contract cannot be assig…
- ABDUL ALI PRAMANIK v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 371
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 289 (2) the judge should be instructed to the jury if they cannot establish a crime against the accused, even if they do not have evidence of prosecution, unles…
- IN THE MATTER OF ELAHEE BAKSH & CO LTD. v. IN THE MATTER OF ELAHEE BAKSH & CO LTD. 1958 PLD 378
281 (1) and (2) of the Companies Act, 1913, the High Court is not capable of relieving the Company from its default liability and for which a removable judicial proceeding has already been initiated, …
- ISHRAT AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 384
How to record a Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 297 jury charge It is imperative that the chiefs in charge must clearly and clearly state what the law was actually exhibiting in itself. There s…
- DADA LIMITED v. PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER 1958 PLD 393
The CLC's Code of Conduct appeals to the original decree of Code XLI.…
- SHAH ALAM AND OTHERS v. THE CROWN 1958 PLD 403
Pakistan Penal Code Section 6 R6 rules that the evidence of prosecution in sexual offenses should be substantiated, not strictly applicable in cases of sexual abuse. Abduction is not a matter of sexua…
- APOSH ALI, ON BEHALF OF SAILENDRA-NATH CHAKRABORTI- 1 ST PARTY v. AMJAD ALI BHAIYA AND OTHERS-2ND PARTY 1958 PLD 415
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 145 Section 145 Does Not Apply to Employers Under Section 145, an order declaring to be a party must be made to all parties to a dispute without jurisdiction.…
- ASMAT FAKIR ALIAS ASMAT ALI FAKIR v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 419
Recovering an article stolen from a house occupied by Pakistan Penal Code Section 412 is not sufficient to prove that under section 412, any such person is convicted.…
- ABDUL KADER v. THE CHAIRMAN, DACCA MUNICIPALITY 1958 PLD 425
Section 3 (54) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 10 (2) The District Magistrate is authorized to act only through the Legislature. Is gone To the Magistrate seeking, under Section 3 (54) of …
- CHAND MUHAMMAD MONDAL v. FAYEZUDDIN AHMED AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 435
Section 146 The Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882) cannot be called for the principle of section 106 representation where the legacy of the original tenant is equally interested in the tenancy.…
- ULFATUNNESSA v. MESSRS. RAJLAXMI INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO., LTD 1958 PLD 438
Evidence Act 1872 section 114 (f) denies the validity of the notice sent by a post registered with postal verification, which is conclusive evidence that the notice was binding until it was proved to …
- THE STATE v. FASHIRUDDIN AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 445
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 307 When to Interfere with a Jury Verdict Unless a Jury's Decision Can Be Interrupted unless it is found that the decision is misleading and clearly erroneous …
- DADA LTD v. R. S. N. COMPANY LTD 1958 PLD 452
Limitation Act 1908 First Schedule, Arts 30 and 31 Suit for Small Delivery Damages…
- MESSRS. ABDUR RAHMAN ABDUL GANI v. MESSRS. MACKINNON MACKENZIE & CO. OF CHITTAGONG, AND ANOTHER 1958 PLD 460
The Carriage of Goods Act 1925 Article III imposes the responsibility of the shipowners born under the principles of the English Common Law Article 115, Limitation Act (IX of 1908)…
- THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS v. DAWOOD CORPORATION LTD 1958 PLD 472
C Customs Act 1878 Sections 20, 37 and 86 The obligation to pay import duty depends on the goods entering the port, the prices for duty duties shall be those of the word \ final \ in the last entry in…
- ALUMINIUM PRODUCTS LTD., CHITTAGONG v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, CHITTAGONG 1958 PLD 481
Trade Marks Act 1940 Section 10 (1) Question of Maturity and Determination of the likelihood of a fraud test should be considered with reference to the likelihood of matching and fraud.…
- KERAMAT ALI v. NIRMAL KRISHNA DATTA 1958 PLD 486
Bengal Agricultural Lenders Act 1936 Section 8 Board has no jurisdiction where there is no standard of credit to determine the existence of debt…
- SERAJUDDIN KAZI v. RAIRAMAN SEN AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 490
Sections 13 and 32 (3) of the Evidence Act, 1872, the description of the boundaries in a document is not admissible in a document between the third party against the proprietary interest of the person…
- BENIMADHAB PAL v. SACHINANDAN ROY 1958 PLD 494
A note promising to be executed in Articles 4, 5 and 21 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 will be paid in Galachipa, Pakistan.…
- SHER ALI v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 499
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 364 bodies can be charged under Section 302 when the body found after the alleged abduction can only be charged if it is a murder or a summary of the murder co…
- MESSRS AHMED ABDUL GANI, MERCHANTS v. MESSRS RAHMANIA TRADING CO., MERCHANTS 1958 PLD 512
Section 37 (1) of the Goods Act 1930 provides the buyer with the option of accepting the quantity supplied to the seller or otherwise the seller has to reject the same or the same thing if the seller …
- ALI AKBAR v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 519
There is no evidence that the Pakistan Penal Code Section 167, which states that the accused was given responsibility for the preparation of the document, is not admissible, for keeping the sentence u…
- MUHAMMAD BAHARUDDIN SARKAR v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 532
The Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) In the absence of pre-approval for prosecution, professionals prevent complete proceedings. In the absence of sanction, a special judge has no juris…
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. PIONEER BANK LTD. AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 535
The issuance of sections 29 and 45 of the Demand Notice of the Income Tax Act, 1922, becomes a debt due to a government attachment document or does not affect the sale of a public debt or a mortgage m…
- SATISH CHANDRA PAL v. MST. MAZIDAN BEGUM 1958 PLD 541
Evidence Act 1872 Section 34 Accounts that are kept in regular business are in accordance with the evidence where the accounts are kept in regular business and there is nothing in the record to show t…
- KALU BEPARI v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 549
The decision of the Court of Appeal's decision on the facts read with Section 7 367 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) does not indicate that the court has applied its arguments to the evidence.…
- RAJAB ALL BEPARI v. THE ,PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1958 PLD 552
By the special magistrate appointed under the East Pakistan Food (Special Courts) Ordinance (XV of 1956) or the East Pakistan Food (Special Courts) Act (X of 1956), the East Pakistan Food (Special Cou…
- THE DACCA NATIONAL MEDICAL INSTITUTE, DACCA v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER 1958 PLD 560
Constitution of Pakistan 1956 Article 10 Medical Institute An association government has not been empowered under any Speak Act to pass an order to close such an institute interfering with fundamental…
- ISHAQUE MIA AND OTHERS v. ABDUL MALEK 1958 PLD 564
Section 9 of the Code9 Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) prevents the complainant from entering and occupying a contentious land; Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) stripping of land from such land is n…
- SONA MIA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 572
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 7 & 4 and 7367 which apply to decisions passed by the courts in addition to the High Court.…
- SARAT KUMAR KANUNGOE v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS 1958 PLD 574
Achievement of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948 3 Applying for Public Purpose A fair government but not a sales judge should be in the general interest of the society, and demand not to b…
- BADSHA MIA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1958 PLD 598
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 190 (1) (a) and 200 magistrates review this case when they make up their mind on the complaint and propose action under section 200, etc., on the oath. It is …
- SARAT CHANDRA MAJUMDAR v. SMT: HARA SUNDARI DE 1958 PLD 605
Does the decision made under section 20 and 8 section 20 of the Bengal Agricultural Lenders Act, 1936, does not exclude the jurisdiction of the civil court while refusing to enjoy the application unde…
- ABDUR RAHMAN SIKDAR v. KALI DAS BASU 1958 PLD 618
Civil Procedure Code Order XXI O XXI Implementation of CPC Decrees and Orders, r 57 words ree Holder's default words mean Procedure default in Rule 57 of Order 21 of the Civil Procedure Code The appea…
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.