Dhaka High Court — Judgments of 1962
77 reported judgments of the Dhaka High Court from 1962.
- SUBHA KARAN v. THE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 1
CPC Commissions Civil Procedure Code Order XXVI (Commission for Examining Witnesses) o XXVI, r 5 Examination of foreign commissions in a foreign country, which is not legally recorded…
- BADIUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 7
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section (350 ((?) and ()) Re-trial Section applicable 350 applicable Not applicable In case of re-trial transfer, different from applicable section (350 ((applicable)))…
- MUZAFFAR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 16
The offense under sections 161 and 161/116 is different from the offense under section 161/116.…
- AYUBUR RAHMAN v. SYED BASHIR ALI 1962 PLD 23
Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 104 Heavy Evidence Claim Lying to the Plaintiff To prove his claim that the plaintiff's claim proves that he changed from defendant to prove his title that Kabbalah was a…
- NEW ZEALAND INSURANCE CO. LTD v. M. A. ROOF 1962 PLD 31
Cargo for Freight Act 1925 Section 2 and Article III, Clause 6 Act applies to transport goods from any port in the sea to another port, whether it is on the sea or outside Pakistan. Carriage by source…
- THE STATE v. TASIRUDDIN 1962 PLD 46
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 342 did not attract the attention of the accused as it investigated the crime weapon.…
- NETAI SIKARI v. SASHI BHUSAN BISWAS 1962 PLD 60
The result of the CPC appearance and non-submission of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX not from the date of the information in the I and the Decree Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164…
- BASANTA KUMAR CHOWDHURY v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 61
Section 8 of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1958, which the Special Judge can rely on, must be the recorded evidence by a competent court: o When such evidence is amended in the Pakistan C…
- KHANDAKAR BELAYET HOSSAIN v. UMMA AYESA SIDDIKA CHOWDHURY 1962 PLD 78
Section 44 of the Property Act 1882 Female Member of an Unincorporated Family: Shared occupation of a dwelling house with a person living in a different area with the heir and her husband cannot be al…
- BADIUZZAMAN v. AMIN ULLAH 1962 PLD 81
The Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 439 Sessions Judge, has no jurisdiction to appeal appeals, the accused under the amendment has no jurisdiction to grant immunity to the High Court, if he kne…
- BALARAM SARKAR v. NABA KANTA SARKAR 1962 PLD 83
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Failure to give notice or report public accusation against Section 107 Magistrate, took action against the order making such persons illegal.…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. TANGAIL GENERAL TRADING & TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD 1962 PLD 86
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 10 (2) (xvi) Transport company monthly premium postal authorities are paid for obtaining clearance in addition to number of trips Capital or Revenue Expenses test case law …
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA v. WAHIDUR RAHMAN, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, COMPANIES CIRCLE IV 1962 PLD 104
Income Tax Act 1922 Sections 3, 7 and 18 (2) Finance Act, 1957, Section 17 (3) Third Schedule, Individuals are not liable to pay tax under the individual tax if their gross income is the Finance Act. …
- CHANDRA SEKHAR SHOME v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 119
In the absence of bilateral and mutual arrangements between Pakistan and the State concerned, the Delivery Act of 1903 cannot be implemented.…
- ABDUR RASHID BHUIYA v. E. A. HASHMI, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE (FOOD), NARAYANGANI DACCA 1962 PLD 122
Order violations of the East Pakistan (Control of Goods) Act 1956 Sugar and Sugar Products Control Order, 1948, CL5 Section 6, the East Pakistan Controlling Goods Act (I of 1956)…
- BASHIRULLAH v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 126
Transfer of Sections 9, 107 and 116 of the Property Act 1882 leases for more than one year of immovable property a valid lease for the first year made without a registered invoice after which the tena…
- ABDUL MAJID v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 132
Government employees read with Article Pakistan 1956 Article 181 Article 180 can only get relief against dismissal, dismissal or reduction of post as per the provisions of Article 181. Until now, it h…
- MUHAMMAD TOTA MIA v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 152
Land enforcement law governs the option of acquiring or acquiring a property for a public purpose under one of two different pieces of law. Acquisition of property under the Act does not provide for t…
- OSMAN ABDUL KARIM BAWANEY v. THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CHITTAGONG 1962 PLD 162
Section 30, 39, 167 (8) and 167 (9B) inquiry under section 30 read with support of section 39, not by itself, on the basis of being found guilty under sections 167 (8) and 167 (9B). To show the requir…
- SAKHAWAT HOSSAIN v. CHITTAPANJAN COTTON MILLS, LTD. DACCA 1962 PLD 176
Companies Act 1913 read with section 72, section 38 and 3 act, the registered office of the company from one sovereign state is not transferred to any other company, which transferred its registered o…
- SYED KANCHAN ALI v. SHAHJAHAN 1962 PLD 192
Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 526 (3) (8) Defined by Party Interest (Case under Section 302, PPC) Defendant's uncle, (father not alive) whether interested in the party Transfer requests by pr…
- ARSHED MASTER v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 205
Although Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Sections 509 (1) and (2) are not referred to as medical witnesses, this does not mean, when called upon by the magistrates, Can be approved and verified. Exami…
- FARMAN ALI DEWAN v. MUNSUR ALI 1962 PLD 214
Civil Procedure Code Order VII, r 11 and Section 2 (2) of the CPC Plaintiff VII, in all cases the decision to reject the plaintiff's order runs as a decree if the question is settled between the parti…
- THE STATE v. KORBAN SARDAR 1962 PLD 221
Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) examines the evidence to determine if the case is proceeding in court and not to the possibility of conviction.…
- AYAJ ALI v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 223
Under section 256, charges are dropped under Sections 342 and 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC).…
- SYED MOAZZAM HOSSAIN v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 232
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 514 Bonds Court Satisfaction Required for Criminal Appeal, Forfeiture of Bonds The bond must be addressed to a special judge, where another special judge orders…
- HAJI MATIUR RAHMAN CHOWDHURY v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 238
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 386 (1) (b) and (3) may permit a collector to collect fines in accordance with the civil procedure, the fine levy of sentencing, the district magistrate, its N…
- ABDUR RASHID v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 245
Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) can be obtained only under section 89 to recover the attached property.…
- NUR ALI GAZI v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 249
Section 114 (b) of the Evidence Act 1872 is not admissible unless it relies on the relied upon evidence to verify the details of the substance.…
- REKATULLA v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 261
Evidence Act 1872 Section 27 A joint statement of two accused in police custody whose recovery record does not show who first disclosed that the evidence against both is not useable.…
- SAFIA KHATUN v. MOULVI MAHBUBAR RAHMAN 1962 PLD 265
Implementation of the CCC Orders and Orders Regulations XXI, R35, CL1 and CL2 consistently comply with the conditions to be executed in the application of CL1 and CL2 Disagreement with those who hold …
- SYED MOHD. KHALILULLAH v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 270
Section 4 of the Anti-Corruption Prevention Act of 1947 should accept reasonable explanations for bribery by the testimony of witnesses to the exclusion of guilt. By way of documents presented by the …
- NAWAB ALI BISWAS v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 278
Evidence Act 1872 Section 32 Disagreements between a doctor's recording of a doctor's death and a post-mortem inspection of a doctor regarding the possibility of being able to speak after a fatal inju…
- KAZI BAHAUDDIN AHMED v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 292
Section 2 [Read with East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951), Section 2 (12)] The establishment of some shops in proximity to the old hat is not equivalent to the establis…
- MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE v. MUHAMMAD ANU MIA 1962 PLD 301
The charge to discharge in connection with a particular offense may be equivalent to a discharge if the magistrate applied his mind or deliberately avoided hearing any other allegation that the accuse…
- MESSRS MOMIN MOTOR CO v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DACCA 1962 PLD 310
Order under section 58 section 58 of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, neither the judiciary nor the judiciary can be authorized unless the order is made by the Administrative Officer under …
- ABDUL MANNAN v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 334
Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) can be defended by the claimant, including the right to deal with the evidence in defendant's defense, denying Section 245 of the Code of Criminal Pro…
- THE STATE v. SATYAPADA BISWAS 1962 PLD 340
The Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) and Section 191 used under Section 124 of the Motor Vehicles Act (IV 1939), on their knowledge of the offenders, were initially requested by the offender…
- HSE YUNG HSIEH v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 349
Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951 Section 3 (d) read with Pakistan Citizenship Rules 1972, r 6 Obtaining citizenship from India depends on the intention of being permanently resident in Pakistan No citize…
- MESSRS BUNMAN\'S BUILDERS v. LAND ACQUISITION DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CHITTAGONG 1962 PLD 356
Requirements of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948 Approval of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act (XIII of 1948) (as amended by the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Approval (Amendmen…
- AZIZUL ISLAM v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 368
The order under section 3 must be in writing and signatures must be signed in order to read the studies of Sections 3 and 4 of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948. Impact Acquisition Knowled…
- BARADA PRASANNA LOD v. KUBBAD MIA 1962 PLD 381
The Limitation Act 1908 Section 12 read with the Article 152 ree Decision Date \ The date of the decision which pronounced this decision, however, was later produced and signed on the Civil Procedure …
- OMER ALI v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 418
Evidence Act 1872 Section 32 Declaration of dying depends on the weight in which the statement was made, and the exact words of the record have not been partially unacceptable or rejected, even if val…
- THE STATE v. DARAJUDDIN MONDAL 1962 PLD 424
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 235 and 239 (d) Many individuals commit different crimes through the common purpose of coordinating the time and place of a series of interconnected events. Th…
- ASHIT KUMAR ADITYA v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 441
Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Acceptance of reward award for the right to be shown in the case of ex-offenders if the bribe is compelled to accept that if he did not pay the bribe, the Prevention of…
- A. L. ZAHIRUL HUQ KHAN v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 447
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 514 (2) shall be heard on the occasion of the bail without such an opportunity to guarantee the execution of an illegal lawyer, whether the unacceptable Crimina…
- SANTOSH KUMAR MITRA v. HARISHIKESH MONDAL 1962 PLD 453
The former Decker Duterte suit is dismissed for setting aside a decree obtained by fraud that the court had stopped praying for in the sale case. O II, r 2 and O VII, r 7…
- THE STATE v. BALAHARI DAS SUTRADHAR 1962 PLD 467
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 84 is to raise suspicion about the existence of evidence on the accused accused of insanity or to enforce the Exception Proof Act (1 of 1872) because of a situation whi…
- OKIL ALI v. BEHARI LAL PAUL 1962 PLD 487
Pakistan Penal Code Section 295 does not require the investigation of the proprietary property of the land used as a synagogue, with no exemptions, 1860 the presence of any sanctuary by any synagogue …
- SISHU BALA GHOSE v. PROFULLYA CHANDRA MONDAL 1962 PLD 490
The dismissal of a petition for a grant of the Securities Act 1925 Section 218 Letter of Administration Court is not obligated to proceed with it and to conclude on the judicial decision of the points…
- MUKHLESUR RAHMAN v. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARAYANGANJ 1962 PLD 497
Basic Democratic Order 1959 Article 25 (2) (a) Second SH, Part II, read with CL2 (D), Official, full time and salary in CL2 (D), Part 11, Second SH Specific terms Is used in a broad sense to identify …
- MOMTAZ BEGUM v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 516
Sections 3 and 5 and the Land Acquisition Act (of 1894) do not provide two alternative modes of acquisition of land in the public interest. Act, 1894: Acquisition of property under the Bengal Emergenc…
- NOOR AHMED v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1962 PLD 533
Under the Basic Democracy Order 1959 Article 25 (4) and the East Pakistan Local Councils (resignation and removal of members) Rules, 1960, r 4 r 4 (1), the notice and the approval of the Council to re…
- TASARANNESSA v. TAJAMUDDIN 1962 PLD 540
Limitation Act 1908 Article 10 Excessive runs by the buyer in the possession of the property purchased before the pre-emptive purchaser stands for physical possession means physical possession of the …
- HAJI SADARUDDIN v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 543
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 211 case was presented to the court but the accused was eventually acquitted, accordingly, (first conviction under Section 211 not guilty).…
- MAKHANLAL NAG v. REAJUDDIN SEPAI 1962 PLD 545
The people of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 section 96 (1), (2) are expected to claim pre-emption in respect of the property which has already been sought for vacancy. The par…
- DELBAR ALIAS DALU SARDAR v. SARADA SUNDARI DEBYA 1962 PLD 548
The date of commencement of the provisions of Articles 88 and 89 of the East Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949, shall be taken as the date of establishment of the suit, which has a term of 12 …
- SATYA RANJAN HALDAR v. SURENDRA NATH DAS 1962 PLD 554
Section 96 and 90 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950, a partner is not entitled to purchase under section 96A unless it is the person holding the share or transferring the shar…
- THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. MIR GOLAM SARWAR 1962 PLD 557
Bengal Police Regulation 1943 Roll 861, CL (E), not in disputes paras 2 and 3, empowers the competent authority to pass a final order of dismissal after giving a personal hearing on the guilty words a…
- RADHA CHARAN SARDAR v. HARIBAR MONDAL 1962 PLD 564
CPC appeals of Civil Procedure Code Order XMLII Order O XLIII, r 1 (u) Despite the appeal against the remand order, the trial court has dealt with the remand even if the appeal is otherwise remanded. …
- THE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, DACCA v. RADHA BALLAV HALDAR AND DINABANDHU SARKAR 1962 PLD 571
Sections 23A (6) and 12 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, were presented in one place and failure to repay the money in another place is a simultaneous court-hearing offense in which t…
- THE STATE v. HARMUZ MONDAL 1962 PLD 574
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) section 526 enables the High Court to follow up on a report submitted by a subordinate court and not merely on the representation by the administrative head action,…
- THE INDIA BANK LTD v. DURVESH BROTHERS 1962 PLD 582
Section 21 (3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 relates to the agreement, which stipulates that the central government or the State Bank is authorized to execute the decree and execute the …
- EKRAM HOSSAIN v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 590
Pakistan Panel Code Section 300, Exception `Fourth All Components Will Accept Exception Request…
- PAKISTAN THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DACCA v. BADARUNNESSA 1962 PLD 595
Provide two alternatives to the collector for the recovery of another demand under the Retrieval of Public Demands Act 1913 by acting in accordance with section 51 (2) of section 46 (2) and AXXI, Civi…
- NIRMAL KUMAR CHATTAPADHYA v. NAZRUL ISLAM 1962 PLD 600
Maintaining an application for alternatives before the final order has been approved, even though the Civil Procedure Code Order XXII of the CPC, Marriage and Parties Insurance Act XXII, suits due to …
- ABDUL AZIZ LAHARI v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 611
Section 109 (a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not consider the continuous process of hiding from moment to moment to avoid or to avoid arrest.…
- DAUD ALI AND GHULAM MUSTAFA v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 613
Section 154 of the Evidence Act 1872, allowing a party to examine his own testimony, does not equate with the court's contention that the witness is a liar.…
- ABDUL AWAL v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 623
Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1958 Section 6 (5) Approval of litigation against the Order of Authority, which does not indicate what papers were placed before it or which matters were involved…
- MST. SAKHINA KHATUN v. AHAMMAD ALI MIA 1962 PLD 630
Mohammedan Laws discussing divorced Bedouin-style divorces (simultaneous declaration of three divorces)…
- MAFIZUR RAHMAN SARDAR v. EAST PAKISTAN THROUGH COLLECTOR OF KHULNA 1962 PLD 635
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 declares that in case of further relief in the possession of the plaintiff suits or there is no danger to it, the order must be postponed.…
- ASMAT ALI KHAN v. KIRAN KUMAR SEN ROY CHOWDHURY 1962 PLD 640
The CPC appearance and non-submission of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in substantial compromises between the parties, such as keeping the preceding order separately and the costs incurre…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. BHUPENDRA NARAYAN ROY CHOWDHURY 1962 PLD 643
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 92 does not apply to the authorities of the temple to set up a temple on the property of a temple in the hands of foreigners or foreigners.…
- NOWAB MEAN CHOWDHURY v. SYED EZAZ-UD-DIN AHMED 1962 PLD 655
Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 22 (I) (II) Sections (1) and (II) Examples of specific performance are not strict rules for using judicially express convictions under the circumstances of each case.…
- MUHAMMAD ABDUL RAHMAN v. ABDUL JABBAR 1962 PLD 665
CPC Parties' Civil Procedure Code Order I Suite OI, rr 9 and 10 may take action if non-participation of the required party suit does not affect the rights…
- MD. HASAN ALI CHOWDHURY v. THE STATE 1962 PLD 671
Copies of the statements of the prosecution witnesses under section 6 (7) of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1958 did not prove to be a crime where the failure to supply the copies resulted …
- MOKSED ALI KHAN v. KATU KHAN 1962 PLD 690
Judicial proceedings containing administrative and judicial orders cannot be inflamed by a court order Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 11…
Other years — Dhaka High Court
1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.