Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAJI MAJIBUR RAHMAN AND OTHERS versus THE STATE


Criminal proceedings under section 77 and 82 of the Registration Act, 1908, pending civil suit pending under section 82, joint proceedings in the dispute criminal proceedings withheld.

PLD1958 Dacca 136

Before Chakraborti, J

Haji MAJIBUR RAHMAN and others‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Opposite‑Party

Criminal Revision No. 496 of 1957, decided on 17th December 1957.

Registration Act (X171 of 1908), Ss. 77 & 82‑

Criminal case under S. 82 pending‑Civil suit brought under S. 77‑ Points in dispute common‑Criminal proceeding stayed.

Where in a complaint lodged under section 82 of the Registration Act and a civil suit filed under section 77 of the Act the points in dispute were common.

Held,

that in the suit brought under section 77 of the Registration Act, the points in dispute will be thrashed out and the proceeding in the criminal case should, an the interest of justice, be stayed pending the disposal of the civil suit.

M. Hakim with A. Quddus and Serajul Huq for Petitioners.

JUDGMENT

CHAKRABORTI, J.‑

Heard the learned Advocate and perused the records. A complaint has been lodged under section 82 of the Registration Act by the Registrar of Nabinagar and a criminal case has been started therefrom. In the meantime the petitioners have filed a civil suit under section 77 of the said Act. The question is whether the criminal case should be stayed pending the disposal of the civil suit. The learned Advocate for the petitioners also prayed for quashing the proceedings in the criminal case, but no Rule was issued on this‑ petition. It is now agreed that there cannot be any question of quashing. The learned Advocate for the petitioners only prays for stay. Now, in the suit brought under section 77 of the Act, the points in dispute will be thrashed out, and the proceedings in the criminal case should, in the interest of justice, be stayed pending the disposal of that civil suit.

The Rule is accordingly made absolute but the prayer for quashing the proceedings is rejected.

Z. A. S.

Rule made absolute.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Blitang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.