Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AKHIL ALI MULLA versus KING


Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Article 395 False accusations in the law If, if the participants are less than five, under section 395 the offense requires at least five participants, obviously only three persons on this charge Had participated. Makes no mention of the incident and any other persons, under law, a valid charge under Section 395 of the Code of Conduct

P. L. D. 1950 Dacca 6

DIVISION BENCH

Before Ellis and Ispahani, JJ.

AKHIL ALI MULLA and another‑Accused‑Appellants

Versus

KING‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 269 of 1948, decided on 22nd November, 1949.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-----

S. 395‑Charge bad in law if, participants are less than five.

As an offence under section 395 requires a minimum of five participants therein, obviously a charge which merely recites that three persons took part in the occurrence and makes no mention of any other persons, cannot, in law, be a valid charge under section 395 of the Code.

A. K. Fazlul Haq and A. M. Sayem for Appellants.

S. Afzal, Deputy Legal Remembrancer, for Crown.

ELLIS, J.‑----

This is an appeal by one Akkel Ali Molla who was convicted under section 395 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years by the learned 'Sessions Judge of Bakarganj an the 21st October, 1948.

The appeal must be allowed. It appears from the record of the trial in the Sessions Court that the charge as framed by the Magistrate and the charge to which the appellant was called upon to plead in the Court of Sessions, merely named three persons, Kadam Ali, Mansur Ali Molla and the appellant Akkel Ali Molla himself and‑charged then of having committed a dacoity in the boat of Jonab Ali, the informant, on the 13th August, 1947. As an offence under section 395 requires a minimum ‑of five partici pants therein, obviously a charge which merely recites that three persons took part in the occurrence and makes no mention of any other persons, cannot, in law, be a valid charge under section 39,5 of the Code.

In the circumstances, we allow the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence of the Appellant and considering the circumstances of the case, we do not direct his re‑trial. The appellant will now be released from jail, if he is not required in any other connection.

ISPAHANI, J.--------I agree.

K.M.A. Appeal allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Goular Khel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.