KHADIMHUSSAIN,A.S.I. versus SUPERINTENDENTOFPOLICE,RAHIMYARKHAN
R 4 (1) (b) (i) Action against accused of absent from duty for fourteen days on five different occasions against reduction in fines as Assistant Sub Inspector in the salaried public servant. Done. Investigating the employee against the civil servant for illegally agreeing and filing a false case was investigated and the inquiry officer examined the evidence presented to him and concluded that the accused against the civil servant. Has been, the inquiry report proved, and after giving the opportunity to the civil servant to file an appeal by the public servant against the order of the magistrate authority, the appellate authority changed the sentence of dismissal from employment to two years equal pay reduction. done. The charges against the civil servant of the Appellate Authority were fully justified, however, the punishment for the termination of the job was very severe and the punishment for dismissal / reduction of salary equal to two years of pay reduction. Sentencing was not granted for two years \ rise as MA under penalty of punishable Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1973, but in accordance with R4 of these Rules, for more than three years without cumulative effect. Withholding the increment for the term was presented as a minor punishment, the service tribunal adopted the idea of relating to public servants. Fines reduction in the salary of a stage Yamani will be imposed pay cuts in two years, which would be all reasonable and proportionate punishment. Failure of part of a civil servant / offense to perform his duties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
