Find a Lawyer

FIDA MUHAMMAD SANAI versus CHAIRMAN FEDERAL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3, Enforcement of Seniority C Null Civil Employee, which was a necessary party, the Appeal Service Tribunal in its appeal filed by the Government employee found that although the Government employee in his appeal Is a complaint against the specific order under which public servants were promoted on the basis of prejudice, but they challenged this order in appeal or representation of any department in accordance with SA, Service Tribunals Act, 1973. Service tribunal specifically cited the representation of a civil servant, in which he referred to his junior service There was no mention of any kind of tap development, therefore, the verification of the appeal of the public servant was dismissed, the seniority in the cadre in which the government employee was judged, according to the SC of PLD 1987 172, therefore, cannot be resumed on such a case and the applicant's office failed to file any appeal or representation under the order of a Supreme Court employee, dated August 18, 1983, depending on the memorandum. There was no result in the decision to be made, its appeal was not sustained under the applicants of Section 4, Service Tribunals Act, 1973. Y In his junior year he was granted immunity for development, but he still did not apply to the appeal, therefore, the appeal of the public servants was not properly formed. The leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances. law websites from Fizagat lawyer