Find a Lawyer

W.A.P.D.A. versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

Pakistan WAPDA Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1978 R 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Employees twice in the post of Water and Power Development Authority The major conviction was that the employee of the factory was awarded for years for stealing electricity from a factory owner and using a government vehicle without authorization, under which the Appellate Authority stopped a five-year hike in fines up to five years. And termed his suspension period as extraordinary without pay, did not fight his case before the service tribunal but Requested that the penalty imposed on him reduced the service tribunal from a five-year extension to a two-year extension. The complaint of the Vitality Petitioner was that although it is a victim of corruption, the servant did not deal with the merits of the matter, the punishment was beer, B ordered that without attending the service tribunal, he committed the offense. The question of attraction or notice of it, a question about the law of public importance, arose because it did not conflict with the merits of the error and the error was dishonest in the employer's property. Whether the arrangement by the Tribunal may be altered in any way by the employee famous lower court advocate from Rahwali lawyer