Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBARKHAN versus GOVERNMENTOFSINDH

R13 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4, Proviso (B) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Jurisdiction Service Tribunal Bar Extent Inc. 6F Publicity Employee claimed that it was for desperation. Would not pray but would qualify to be appointed under R13, Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules 197, 1975, so for questions regarding fitness, Section 4, Sindh Service Tribunals Such a prayer was not banned under the Act 1973. Promotion was not included in the seniority of a public servant who was not promoted on his turn but was subsequently promoted, R 13, Sindh Civil Servant (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules to be fixed in light of the provisions of 1975. Where a public servant who was not considered for promotion for any reason other than his nomination, was subsequently hired by any competent authority under his authority. Was placed subject to any order placed. He is believed to be promoted to the same level as his juniors in advanced employment, thus, while maintaining the sanity of his batchmates, the public servant was not promoted because of negative comments against him. In 1972, such negative remarks were not disclosed to Civil. For many years the inactivity of negative comments from the servant made the accuracy of such remarks completely ineffective. On the basis of such controversial remarks, the government employee could not be subjected to any negative order while the defendant was full field for public servants not to consider public employees. Completely on a foundation and top advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer