MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus MUSHTAQUE AHMED
The evidence on the Mohammedan Law pre-emption record that the pre-emptor question was sufficient to establish a pre-emptive right to purchase the land, the former importer established on the record, that he owned the land along with the land. Is the owner of the water and from the same water he took water from. Such evidence, which was irrigating the land in question, and that it was involved in common facilities and subdivisions, was not challenged by cross-examination, and was rejected by the Wanderers Trial Court for not presenting evidence. Was not done Thus, on the contrary, non-appellate orders of the appellate court and the High Court were rejected and the trial court's order was restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer
