ABDUL JABBAR KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Sindh Civil Servant (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules 1975 R 13 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4, Proviso (B) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Denied extension of service tribunal bar The civil servant claimed that he would not pray for prejudicial development but would determine his supremacy under R13, Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules 197, making such prayer a Section 4. Was not prohibited under section (b). In the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973, the question of fitness for development did not include the seniority of a civil servant who was not promoted at his turn but then promoted, R13, Sindh Civil Servants. Will be made in light of the provisions of Authentication and Sanity) Rules, 1975 where a civil servant who was not considered to be a development for any reason other than his disqualification for development, was subsequently promoted under any order made by C. ? The authority disqualified for the purpose of inter-seniority in the upper class will be deemed to have been promoted in the same manner as its juniors, thus, against the civil servant while maintaining the sanity of his batchmates. Due to negative remarks that were made, it was not promoted. He was not told such negative remarks from a civil servant for several years in 1972. Non-interaction of negative remarks completely invalidates the authenticity of such remarks; on the basis of such non-remarks remarks, the employee cannot be subjected to any negative order. Consideration of public servants \ while promoting accountable public servants,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer