MUHAMMADSHAFIQUEMUGHAL versus ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL,AZADJAMMUANDKASHMIR,MUZAFFARABAD
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1977 R 6 The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 relating to the dismissal of a civil servant on the charge of dismissal of a civil servant. Maintains the legality procedure adopted by the Inquiry Officer. Procedure for Inquiry by a Government Employee Oral or Documentary Evidence to the Inquiry Officer Under Supply of R6 (3), Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1977 Need to check. Supporting the charge; he is also authorized to examine the public servant and then decide whether to examine the public servant only if he wants to record his statement. The inquiry officer was in the wrong impression that he was a civil servant. The one who had to prove his innocence was the nature of the cross-examination by the inquiry officer, which was not confirmed. The Service Tribunal formed its opinion on the basis of the documents. Such documents were not acknowledged to the public servant. It was the duty of the inquiry officer to inform the public employee of the abusive material and give it to him. The crime was resolved without the adherence to the relevant rules, and since a serious crime could not be proved against a civil servant based on the search of the Inquiry Officer, he could not be pardoned. Novo inquiry by law, if so suggested
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
