Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus HASSAN MUHAMMAD

Pre-purchase rights of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act 1993 Section 21 (4) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the appointed time of section 42 court, the plaintiff is entitled to any one / 5th of the probable value of the suit land. Must be submitted on or before the specified date. The plaintiff failed to submit the question in the specified date but could not take any action, as the presiding officer suit was postponed to the next hearing for necessary orders and on the same date the presiding officer was on leave again. The suit was postponed and the presiding officer dismissed the date that the court could extend the time set by the court to disburse the right or provide the required security, but it would be reasonable to do so. Explain why the court order was not complied with, However, do not immediately dismiss the case where the default was specified, the court was legally bound to consider whether the circumstances were such as to justify the extension of time. The litigation should be made by a person who failed to comply with a court order and the court was not required to seek clarification of the provisions of section 21 (4) of the Act, in compliance with the court's order No explanation will be asked for. In this way the dismissal of the plaintiff was correct and there was no weakness best advocate from Jehanian lawyer