Find a Lawyer

AZADGOVERNMENTOFTHESTATEOFJAMMUANDKASHMIR versus MUHAMMADAKBARSHAH

Section 12 (as amended by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Amendment) Ordinance, 1995), the section of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974) passed the order for the retirement of section 47 government employees without legal cover. The validity of such an order by enforcement of the effect of the operation of the background of the law Section 12: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 was not amended when the government employee made frequent requests for retirement from the public servants. Was retired upon request of such retirement the Service Tribunal declared a civil retirement. As a servant on section 12, the reason for this was that the amended justification was later amended in section 12, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976, under which the legal defects in the retirement order were abolished. Government employees' retirement orders were issued. Their own application was considered valid where an appeal with uit or retrospective effect was made under the law when the law was amended, the same applied retrospectively. Such amendments will affect the rights of the parties where the unconditional retirement option supports reminders and official Aism actually told the government that he had already moved on to retirement, so such a prayer was unconditional, clear and repeated, and the government accepted such a request from a civil servant, and even if it did at that time If the retirement was not valid then Section 12, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 was amended to give legal cover. As a result, is it permissible to retire, in question online advocate from Gawadar lawyer