MUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI versus CHIEF SECRETARY AZAD GOVRNMENT OG THE STATE OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
The Prime Minister accepted the Government employees' review application of the R12 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Article 44 constitutional application for public servants, under which the applicant (government employee) was ignored. And was issued a directive for their development In Grade 20, the implementation of the Secretary of State's directive as a Prime Minister was not followed, the authorities urged, after the Prime Minister's directive, to appeal, approve and review. Later orders passed were finalized by the authority itself and cannot be reopened. In the second review, any appeal or representation by any authority whatever was approved by the Prime Minister in the second review was in fact approved by the Prime Minister on a previously approved order under which the official Employee Development Orders were issued by the Prime Minister in accordance with the Business Principles (Appeal) Rules, 91 passed under Rule 19 and rules and were issued in accordance with the business principles, final of such orders Was attached to the authority and the authority was banned that the Prime Minister revised the same order and Do not mislead after which the first orders were allegedly canceled (which were administrative reviews which were administrative orders which could not invalidate the orders passed in the first review, which was issued by the Independent 12, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant). Appeals) were finalized under the orders of the Rules, 1991, which were alleged to have been canceled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Umer Kot lawyer