SARDER MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR
Section 4 Retirement Notification of Legal Appeal Qualification Civil servant retires from employment by notification by competent authority after having attained the age of 60, challenging his retirement notification in accordance with the provisions of the Appeal Rules. Instead, the minister introduced the law. Who was not eligible to receive and deal with the matter, the law minister referred the matter to the disqualified authority, which the authority withdrew the retirement notification, but when the matter was sent for approval, the government authority Such a withdrawal was not approved by the government employee if he was disturbed by the notification, he had retired from the job, instead of taking immoral practices by the minister in his favor. Should have filed a review request with the authority, dismiss the retirement notice Doing what was not capable of doing so was an illegal move. The result is that according to the notification, the government employee who retired from the job remained in the field with the entire operating force, before retiring to the competent authority. Failure of the public servant to challenge the original notification in respect of the will prevent him from seeking any remedy by appeal to the service tribunal civil. The servant has no reason to request the service tribunal's jurisdiction; his appeal before the tribunal was without any substance, misunderstood and disqualified, and accordingly he was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
