Find a Lawyer

HAFEEZ-UL-ISLAM versus SUPERINTENDENT,POSTOFFICES,DISTRICTLAHORE(SOUTH),LAHORE,G.P.O

R 4 Two penalty-imposed public servants, who were just working, recognized only eight empty post bags, while upon receipt of the return, eighteen bags were handed over to those responsible for the disposal of ten empty postage bags. Was considered. The amount of the lost ten bags that he deposited with a public servant, was later found to be a fake delivery slip and a counterfeit amount of 18 was made to show that in reality, only eight instead of eighteen shows. Empty postage bags were provided to a civil servant issued a notice of notice and after verifying their chances, he was given the opportunity to hear the punishment for a future "two-year increment withholding penalty. It considers incompetence and mismanagement. Under the R4 of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973, ten empty postage bags, no other fines were dropped, thus the two penalties imposed were negligent because opposition to the public servant was abolished. A government employee confessed to his mistake and said that for whatever reason he had lost ten empty postage bags, it was to pay for those bags that he had paid the second fine for two years withholding the increment. Government documents were imposed on a civil servant for allegedly engaging in counterfeiting, namely two bags of slip bags that were imposed on a civilian employee for separate reasons, it cannot be said why. Is from The civil servant was a low-paid employee and the ensuing financial loss caused problems for his family, the service tribunal, on a completely humanitarian basis, and his past record, which law websites from Chaininda lawyer