MUHAMMADRAFIQUE versus WATERANDPOWERDEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY
Section 17 (1A) government employee was removed from the job after issuing show cause notices, but without giving any person an opportunity to have a personal hearing, so that he, along with others, disregarded the rules. Damaged. The part of the public servant in the financial discipline was on account of the crime for which he was removed from the job, he was no more than anyone else who was found guilty, but either, they were released or they were released. Retired, it would be against the position of civilian employees if the civil servant was punished more severely than others who, under the amended order of the Authority of the Service Service Tribunal, were relatively more responsible for the loss of which Under the government employee was removed from his mandatory retirement job.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
