Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADHANIFSHAH versus DIVISIONALCOMMERCIALOFFICER,PAKRAILWAYS,MULTAN

R 5 (1) A suspended civil servant against whom a guilty plea of unlawful plea was taken, he was suspended for more than two years, the case was investigated against a civil servant, but the matter was investigated. The authority closed down and government employees were restored. After more than two years of suspension he remained in the job but was denied salary for the period of suspension. The Government employee's suspension period was more than three months and nothing was on record nor could the authorities prove that the suspension. Any approval may be granted to continue the period for more than three months. Authorized authority which was required under R5 of the Government Employees (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1973, in the absence of any order of the competent authority, the suspension of the Government employee for a period of more than three months The suspension was an unofficial public servant, so it didn't happen. Discard his salary during the suspension period when he was specially employed when his suspension period was treated as a suspension for employment, for the entirety of the suspension period. Was entitled to salary and other benefits and the civil servant was acquitted of illegal pleas and was reinstated to the job, the latter action did not justify the same charge. Because no one can be defeated twice for the same purpose family advocate from Kashmir lawyer