IMRAN KHAN versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) affirmed the change in duty by the activities of the employees even though the employee was a member of the trade union in the employer establishment but in some records to support this charge. He was not brought in because of his trade union activities, except that he was a simple member. The trade union said that the employee was not defeated by the transfer of duty cleaner to oil cleaner. Nor will he face any deductions in his salary, otherwise the nature of the duties of the employees will not change, Account will enable. The National Industrial Relations Commission does not exercise its limited jurisdiction under the provisions of Section 22A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, nor is it unfair in the meaning of section 15 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 Establishing a wage process was not only a condition of the employee's appointment, but it was also a settled and fundamental right of the employer through which he could always be exercised. The employer faces the interest of the establishment in conducting daily affairs unless the employer has such a right to exercise unreasonable labor within the meaning of section 15 (d) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Can be snatched.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
