KARACHI MARRIOTT HOTEL, KARACHI versus ATA HUSSAIN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (e) Employees were discharged for a maximum period, but Knowing that he did not have any further leave on his reputation, his leave was not deliberately extended, thus all the blame was laid on the employee as he was present for almost three months from his duty. However, the employee was not given any further leave, so he was rightfully dismissed for absenteeism. For more than ten days without leave, in the absence of a reason why employees should be rehabilitated after being dismissed due to desert, the Labor Court's order to instruct employees was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kakul lawyer
