IMDAD HUSSAIN versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) were challenged by the employees on the basis of allegations of unfair wages by the employees on the transfer of employees from one place of employment to another. Due to unfair labor practices. It was normal for employees to meet the daily situation created in the establishment and there was no record to prove that such exchanges were targeted because of certain legal trade, Outbound ion activities were the transfer of employees. The National Industrial Relations Commission would interfere and disrupt daily affairs in the interest of the establishment's service only when there was a clear indication that it was committed because of the activities of the Legal Trade Union. Section 15 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, in favor of employers who failed to establish employed employees, fair practice of laborers, plea against their employers was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Machh lawyer
