Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus DAELIM INDUSTRIAL CO. LIMITED, HUB RIVERPOWER PROJECT

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (G), 25A & 34 National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973 Section 22A (8) (G) 's joint application to employees of National Industrial Relations Jurisdiction to retain There is no restriction on the Commission against filing a joint application by employees under Section 22A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The employer objected that such application is subject to the Industrial Relations Ordinance. Was not retained under the provisions of 25A which was canceled by the National Industrial Relations Commission, section 22A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 Services not under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, was bound to entertain a petition with complaints Term Notes under the provisions of Section 25 of 1969, was not. Under this section of the ordinance only the process of dealing with individual grievance matters is bound to happen, but any of them may be adopted by Section 25A & 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 or the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulation). And duties) The procedure provided by the Regulations, 1973 could not be in compliance with the terms of service of notice under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Remove the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission in any way, and even in the case of individual complaints, the employee is required to approach the National Industrial Relations Commission under Section 22A (8) (g) of Industrial Relations before There was no need to meet the segment conditional. In the absence of any special restriction in filing a joint application under a provision of the Ordinance, 1969 law, there was no reason why employees should be denied their rights to approach the court. list of advocates from Naseerabad lawyer