PAKISTAN POSTAL SERVICES CORPORATION versus LIAQUAT ALI, GENERAL SECRETARY
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (G) and 26 Bilateral Negotiations in the Establishment of the Strike Notice The union, which was the Collective Bargaining Agent of the Establishment (CBA), raised some demands, but the employers' union through the Establishment The status of was disputed. The position that the union official was about to expire and his position was unlikely to be retained because some of the employees applied their dissatisfaction against them and until the current office-bearers were opposed. Until then, he had demanded an election movement. After legally replacing new union officials, existing officials had the right to continue in their union offices and would not be automatically vacated upon the expiration of their offices for which they were elected. The employer had refused to discuss the establishment with the authorities. On their demands, the alliance was not justified in the strike notice issued by the Secretary General o f Union, Industrial Relations Ordinance, pre-requisite as required by section 26 of 1969, bilateral negotiations between the parties. Regarding, the dispute was not complied with the CBA's offices as an internal matter of the union; the employer establishment sought to avoid discussions with the current CBA officials as such. Don't take
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Naukundi lawyer