Regarding the time of death of the deceased child prosecution witness under section 302 (b), 324 and 34 of Qutl-Im, Qutel MMD, attempt to compel evidence, joint intention evidence section 161, CR PC Offer a plausible explanation of such a significant and obvious contradiction, but was not listed that day, according to a report by the Franz Science Laboratory. The incident was reported to have originated with the suspect, though the suspect was identified from his home. Was told to recover, but the incident was a serious disorder. According to the law, the recovery of the weapons of the crime could not be proved because the only minor witness was discharged after the prosecution's victory. While the second witness was told outside the country when investigating the prosecution's witness status, the questions posed to the child's witnesses were not reduced by the trial court in writing, which was illegal and The trial court against the accused recorded by him was set aside, the accused acquitted, and released on condition
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
