Sections 230 (b) and ??2 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of the Sun VI 1997 of Section), Section QQ killings, deliberately mistakenly detained the accused and terrorist police to attack the police party, As a result, three policemen were killed and the prisoner escaped. After investigation, three men were sent to trial, including the doctor's party and the commander's police party trial court, and the commander of the police party was sentenced. The life sentence, while the third was acquitted, was deemed important by the trial court according to the circumstances, even in the appropriate cases. Depending on the circumstances, a sentence can be established, but such evidence should not be credible, merely, imaginative, and solely based on the crime of the accused police. This type of failure exhibited on record indicates the weakness of the prosecution case against the accused, there is a severe gap in the chain of events to ensure that the circumstances, the chain of evidence must be so thorough that Neither reason has been forgotten that it should be according to the accused's innocence. And it should be shown that in all human possibilities, the accused High Court had refused to maintain the conviction on the basis of circumstantial evidence and said that the culprits were wrongly convicted under the High Court's allegations. Both the trial court and the accused were acquitted, in which case an appeal was allowed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015