MALIK TAHIR MEHMOOD versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Sections 13 and 13 A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Request for the Exclusion of Tenant Components Vacancies as well as vacancies between the parties to the good intention was not a tenancy to evict the tenants The intention was a basic and necessary component that failed to prove that the landlord was not needy but was a greedy person who just wanted to increase the rent or rent the house to another tenant for more rent. The tenant may apply to the rent controller to restore the suit premises if the landlord does not occupy it within one month after the eviction or rent it to another tenant after several months of occupancy. Have given. If the landlord did not rent the premises of the suit after eviction, the tenants could be protected and their own business leased to someone else. The landlord needs the suit premises for his personal needs. The tenant did not pay the rent to the applicant, nor did the former landlord submit that the tenant had deliberately charged the payment. Both the courts below refused to grant the landlord wrong and illegal relief. The affected orders placed under both courts were set aside and the tenant was instructed to vacate the house within four months, the constitutional application was accepted.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
