There was no evidence available for Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), attempt to compel Section 324 murder, refusal to file a report, consultation or deliberation, which resulted in false opportunities for the accused. However, a passer-by sustained injury was also reinforced by his statement that the incident occurred at a significant date, time and place, a medical report confirmed by the version of the FIR revealed. The injured received seven injuries, four on the chest area and three on the abdomen, further suggesting the suspect's behavior, how he suffered pain on the cross version of the pelvis. Attacked, raised self-defense. And while it was not understandable from the record who made the aggression, and who acted in self-defense, the parties were generally allowed to guarantee, in the present case, any such case. Could not be submitted, except the firearm, when the prosecution's evidence, first of all, the accused accused of the crime, demanded the death penalty and the accused himself admitted the incident by replacing the cross version. What is, because only Crossfire should be accepted as a bail-out license, every cross case charged, claiming bail as a matter of right Can't do The accused claimed that he was entitled to a bail exemption because of his minor school certificate. He has disclosed that the accused's age is 17 years, according to Section 10 (5) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000. 5 months and 15 days. For 15 years, the accused was entitled to bail.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
