IBRAR AHMAD versus THE STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
Section 496A Penalty for restraining or detaining a woman with criminal intent or appreciating evidence, reduction of complainant, in her report, accused the accused of crime, but when he appeared in court He met with the Chief Justice in his examination. Despite failing to indict anyone, the prosecution's failure and litigation was affirmed by the judicial magistrate's judicial confession, which, in compliance with the legal rules, confessed in his statement under Section 342 of the indictment. Withdrew. The CCP, but the mere eviction of the accused by his confessional statement, was not enough to affect his authenticity, because, conviction, mere confession could be based on guilt, though this would prove to be true. And the voluntary prosecution was successful. Under section 496A, the PPC brought charges in the home, keeping the accused's tender age, and that he had no criminal record, while maintaining the conviction of the accused for a maximum period of seven years. Reduced to three years \ RI fine was also limited to Rs 10,000, circumstances r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
