FAZAL-E-RABBI KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sections 4 and 8 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 6 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Electricity Department Service Rules, the 1993 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 Appointment Promotion Appellant, who was involved in this service. ? In the vacation arrangements as a Sub-Engineer in 2002, the latter was appointed on a regular basis after a test and interview on the recommendations of the relevant Selection Committee in the year 2006, after obtaining the Bachelor's (Hons) degree from the Appellant. The name was added to the seniority list and was placed in serial number 10 of the seniority list when the seniority list was created, at which time the services of the appellant were issued by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Electricity Department Service Rules 1993 [which was amended in 2007. Was implemented] in 2010, repealing the pre-1993 1993 rules, and states that Under the new rules, the quota has been reduced from 15% to 5% for the development of the appellant cadre officials. He said that the rules had no effect, the question was whether the rules were disappointed or possibly implemented. If a new law is enforced, it will have the effect of being predictable, and not biased, unless it is clearly given the effect of disappointment when one is entitled. For a person, this cannot be taken away by the law that repeals it. In the case of the appellant, the decision to develop on the Yard Stick of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Electricity Department Service Rules, 1993 [as amended in 2007] was whatever the allegation was made by him. The rules could not be redeemed by any amendment to the case, after the High Court had considered all the controversial points
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
