DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE versus NEELUM JHELUM HYDRO POWER COMPANY (PVT.) LTD.
Sections 148 and 162 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Code of Conduct), 1984, Rr 33 to 38 deputy commissioner of imported tunnel booring machine related to forfeiture of taxpayer / company affairs accounts related to income tax payment on Inland Revenue. The company, which had paid the tax on the accounts of the company, had demanded that the assessment order be declared without legal authority under section 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and had no legal effect. Deleted and Approved Part of the Legal Writ of Relief Writ Petition Without Registration First Admitted The same can not dispose of, while respondents to the written statements / objections, documents and affidavits, etc. and provides the opportunity to tell the court the evidence in the present case was passed Bowl. Without complying with Rules 33 to 38 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Code of Conduct) 1984, a tax-paying company through banks was found to be a problem for this company, due to the order to forfeit the account. And if it is said that the order to seize the accounts will continue, then the National Treasury High Court will suffer huge losses, in which case the use of inherent powers to suspend the order to seize the company's account is valid. Until they seized the account. The proper forum is always the authority in each court to make the full court. The Supreme Court declared that the writ petition cannot be disposed of after a regular hearing without first admitting the notice to the other party, seeking objections / written statements, but in certain cases the case,
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
