Section 11 Race Judasta, the principle of jurisdiction applied in a case of mathematics where the issue of dispute was considered, and finally the matter of a court of competent jurisdiction between the parties was settled. And such a decision had a final effect on the rights of the parties. The first question to consider by the court was whether the matter was resolved directly and substantially by a court of permanent jurisdiction. The new suitpoint can be aroused again. Within the same parties, and when it finally came to an end and reached the deadline, a fresh case against the same parties was not allowed, the rationale behind Race Judeta's rule was that a party. Could not be defeated twice for the same purpose. There must be some termination of litigation that was based on the cause of the suit. When a decision is announced, the cause of action is integrated into the decision. And filing a fresh case for similar action is equivalent to dragging innocent people into unnecessary litigation \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
