AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus MAHBOOB ASLAM KHAN
The transfer of a jurisdiction order pursuant to Sections 37 & 37 and 38 and the decree decree may be served by the court which approves it, or the court by which it was sent for execution. Transfer to another court for enforcement. If the person against whom this decree was granted was actually and voluntarily residing or operating a business, or personally to take advantage of such other court's jurisdiction with the local limits? works. That if another person does not have any property within the local jurisdiction of the court who has passed sufficient decree to fulfill this decree? And such other court had jurisdiction over the locality. That if this decree is directed to the sale or supply of immovable property outside the local jurisdiction of the court's jurisdiction. And that if the court considers the decree passed for any other reason, in which it will be recorded in writing that the decree must be executed by another such court, the petitioner's request The order may be moved under section 39, section (1) of the CPC. In four cases, it was necessary to send two others to the court for the implementation of the two conditions; And secondly, it shall be a court of competent jurisdiction. This jurisdiction may be territorial and exclusive. The jurisdictional jurisdiction may be that the court is authorized to execute a decree under section 39 (2) of section 39, CPC.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
