WAJID MUNIR versus MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MIRPUR
The writ petitions of Sections 44 and 42 were filed with the High Court on appeal from the High Court, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed within the limits. Was not inconsistent with the principles of the administration of justice, so if either party convinces the court that it has brought the matter under consideration, there is a legal proposal for violation of any principle of law. Or basic rights. And notwithstanding the record of such statement, neither the relevant documents nor the refusal of the affidavit was denied, would justify the filing of the writ petition for a regular hearing, the writ petition for a regular hearing. I will not mean admission, but it will not mean acceptance of a final decision or prayer. Relief, but the appellant succeeded in establishing that its writ petition contained a question of violation of legal law and fundamental rights. Such claims were not rejected by the respondent's affidavit or the submission of relevant documents. Such matters demand the writ petition for justice's dismissal. The writ petition was filed for a regular hearing. The Supreme Court directed the remand of the matter, saying that the High Court would proceed as per law and finally put a stop to it.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
