Sections 12 and 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 96, 100 and O.I., R10, suit for declaring title on the basis of an unregistered contract to sell the suit property, as a party to this suit The trial court has been enforced, but the appellate court, upon deciding the specific performance on the basis of such agreement, requested that the defendant interfere in the appeal against the plaintiff on the basis of such agreement. Can't even claim the truth. And that as a simple declaration, an order for specific performance cannot be approved by the High Court dismissing the interlocutors' appeal. In this case, anyone interested in a suit property or an executive of such contract may challenge only such agreement, and not a third person. It has no right or interest except that the person claiming to be in possession of it could not maintain an appeal against the judgment / decree having no right or interest in the legitimate property. Defendant's legal heritage did not challenge the decision / decree, which was found to be arbitrary. There was no right to retain the appeal as no order was passed against them. The High Court had rightly rejected the interventionist's appeal.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
